Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1312-1319.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.1663. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations

Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Chrissy H Y van Beurden-Tan et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose Since 2000, many new treatment options have become available for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) after a long period in which dexamethasone and melphalan had been the standard treatment. Direct comparisons of these novel treatments, however, are lacking. This makes it extremely difficult to evaluate the relative added value of each new treatment. Our aim was to synthesize all efficacy evidence, enabling a comparison of all current treatments for R/R MM. Methods We performed a systematic literature review to identify all publicly available phase III randomized controlled trial evidence. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, and the Web site www.ClinicalTrials.gov . In addition, two trials presented at two international hematology congresses (ie, ASCO 2016 and European Hematology Association 2016) were added to include the most recent evidence. In total, 17 randomized controlled trials were identified, including 18 treatment options. The evidence was synthesized using a conventional network meta-analysis. To include all treatments within one network, two treatment options were combined: (1) bortezomib monotherapy and bortezomib plus dexamethasone, and (2) thalidomide monotherapy and thalidomide plus dexamethasone. Results The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone was identified as the best treatment. It was most favorable in terms of (1) hazard ratio for progression-free survival (0.13; 95% credible interval, 0.09 to 0.19), and (2) probability of being best (99% of the simulations). This treatment combination reduced the risk of progression or death by 87% versus dexamethasone, 81% versus bortezomib plus dexamethasone, and 63% versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Conclusion Our network meta-analysis provides a complete overview of the relative efficacy of all available treatments for R/R MM. Until additional data from randomized studies are available, on the basis of this analysis, the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone seems to be the best treatment option.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes for Multiple Myeloma.
    Armoiry X, Tsertsvadze A, Connock M, Melendez-Torres GJ, Clarke A. Armoiry X, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2975-2976. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.1828. Epub 2017 Jul 12. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28700274 No abstract available.
  • Reply to X. Armoiry et al.
    van Beurden-Tan CHY, Franken MG, Blommestein HM, Uyl-de Groot CA, Blommestein HM, Uyl-de Groot CA, Sonneveld P. van Beurden-Tan CHY, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2976-2977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7569. Epub 2017 Jul 12. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28700279 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms