Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):24.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0418-4.

Early recognition of multiple sclerosis using natural language processing of the electronic health record

Affiliations

Early recognition of multiple sclerosis using natural language processing of the electronic health record

Herbert S Chase et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic accuracy might be improved by algorithms that searched patients' clinical notes in the electronic health record (EHR) for signs and symptoms of diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). The focus this study was to determine if patients with MS could be identified from their clinical notes prior to the initial recognition by their healthcare providers.

Methods: An MS-enriched cohort of patients with well-established MS (n = 165) and controls (n = 545), was generated from the adult outpatient clinic. A random sample cohort was generated from randomly selected patients (n = 2289) from the same adult outpatient clinic, some of whom had MS (n = 16). Patients' notes were extracted from the data warehouse and signs and symptoms mapped to UMLS terms using MedLEE. Approximately 1000 MS-related terms occurred significantly more frequently in MS patients' notes than controls'. Synonymous terms were manually clustered into 50 buckets and used as classification features. Patients were classified as MS or not using Naïve Bayes classification.

Results: Classification of patients known to have MS using notes of the MS-enriched cohort entered after the initial ICD9[MS] code yielded an ROC AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.90 [0.87-0.93], 0.75[0.66-0.82], and 0.91 [0.87-0.93], respectively. Similar classification accuracy was achieved using the notes from the random sample cohort. Classification of patients not yet known to have MS using notes of the MS-enriched cohort entered before the initial ICD9[MS] documentation identified 40% [23-59%] as having MS. Manual review of the EHR of 45 patients of the random sample cohort classified as having MS but lacking an ICD9[MS] code identified four who might have unrecognized MS.

Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy might be improved by mining patients' clinical notes for signs and symptoms of specific diseases using NLP. Using this approach, we identified patients with MS early in the course of their disease which could potentially shorten the time to diagnosis. This approach could also be applied to other diseases often missed by primary care providers such as cancer. Whether implementing computerized diagnostic support ultimately shortens the time from earliest symptoms to formal recognition of the disease remains to be seen.

Keywords: Computer-assisted [E01.158]; Diagnosis; Diagnostic errors [E01.354]; Early Diagnosis [E01.390]; Electronic health records [E05.318.308.940.968.249.500]; Natural language processing [L01.224.050.375.580]; multiple sclerosis [C10.114.375.500].

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timing of clinical notes used in classification studies. For MS patients in the MS-enriched set, the notes used were written either before or after the entry of first ICD9 code for MS (IDC9[MS]). For control patients in the MS-enriched set and the Random sample set, the notes used were those entered within the last two years of the most recent note

References

    1. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care BoHCS, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015.
    1. Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Safety. 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii21–ii27. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, Studdert DM. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Int Med. 2006;145(7):488–W183. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Callen JL, Westbrook JI, Georgiou A, Li J. Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1334–1348. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1949-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Giardina T, Meyer AD, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(6):418–425. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2777. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types