Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):19-25.
doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.199519.

A descriptive study of hand injuries presenting to the adult emergency department of a tertiary care center in urban India

Murtuza N Ghiya  1 , Shakuntala Murty  1 , Naren Shetty  2 , Rodney D'Cunha  1
Affiliations

A descriptive study of hand injuries presenting to the adult emergency department of a tertiary care center in urban India

Murtuza N Ghiya et al. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2017 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Despite having a dedicated Plastic Surgery Unit, emergency physicians (EPs) manage many of the acute, traumatic hand injuries. Further very minimal information exists about the extent to which tetanus recommendations as per Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices are followed in emergency departments (EDs). Furthermore, the management of pain is often neglected.

Objectives: To provide a clinical description of hand injuries with etiology and mechanism; and describe the trends of ED management, including analgesia and tetanus prophylaxis.

Methodology: Records of eighty patients with hand injuries were reviewed. SPSS version 18 was used for statistical analysis. Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Pearson Chi-square test were used to compare left with right-hand injuries and validate associations, respectively.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 27.41 years and median delay in presentation was 2 h. Occupational injury was the predominant mode of injury (74%) most patients (59 of the 86) received intravenous analgesia; while very few (6) received local anesthesia and (24) received no analgesia at all. A majority of patients (56) received tetanus toxoid prophylaxis, while only four patients (4.6%) also received tetanus immunoglobulin intramuscular. Most patients (71%) were admitted, while only a small number of patients (14%) were discharged from the ED.

Conclusion: Proper training and sensitization towards the need and technique of anesthesia (particularly local anesthesia) would improve the quality of patient care. Printed guidelines and periodic review of the charts would help to overcome poor adherence to tetanus prophylaxis. Hand injuries could be managed better by the EP, with training through rotations to the Plastic Surgery Unit.

Keywords: Analgesia; emergency department; hand injuries; tetanus prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Chart 1
Chart 1
Mode/place of occurrence
Chart 2
Chart 2
Mechanism of injury
Chart 3
Chart 3
Analgesia
Chart 4
Chart 4
Disposition
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Otto C. ABC of Emergency Radiology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007.
    1. Overton DT, Uehara DT. Evaluation of the injured hand. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993;11:585–600. - PubMed
    1. Talan DA, Abrahamian FM, Moran GJ, Mower WR, Alagappan K, Tiffany BR, et al. Tetanus immunity and physician compliance with tetanus prophylaxis practices among emergency department patients presenting with wounds. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:305–14. - PubMed
    1. Harrison B, Holland P. Diagnosis and management of hand injuries in the ED. Emerg Med Pract. 2005;7:1.
    1. Guly HR. Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:263–9. - PMC - PubMed