Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 13:8:95.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00095. eCollection 2017.

Weeds in a Changing Climate: Vulnerabilities, Consequences, and Implications for Future Weed Management

Affiliations
Review

Weeds in a Changing Climate: Vulnerabilities, Consequences, and Implications for Future Weed Management

Kulasekaran Ramesh et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Whilst it is agreed that climate change will impact on the long-term interactions between crops and weeds, the results of this impact are far from clear. We suggest that a thorough understanding of weed dominance and weed interactions, depending on crop and weed ecosystems and crop sequences in the ecosystem, will be the key determining factor for successful weed management. Indeed, we claim that recent changes observed throughout the world within the weed spectrum in different cropping systems which were ostensibly related to climate change, warrant a deeper examination of weed vulnerabilities before a full understanding is reached. For example, the uncontrolled establishment of weeds in crops leads to a mixed population, in terms of C3 and C4 pathways, and this poses a considerable level of complexity for weed management. There is a need to include all possible combinations of crops and weeds while studying the impact of climate change on crop-weed competitive interactions, since, from a weed management perspective, C4 weeds would flourish in the increased temperature scenario and pose serious yield penalties. This is particularly alarming as a majority of the most competitive weeds are C4 plants. Although CO2 is considered as a main contributing factor for climate change, a few Australian studies have also predicted differing responses of weed species due to shifts in rainfall patterns. Reduced water availability, due to recurrent and unforeseen droughts, would alter the competitive balance between crops and some weed species, intensifying the crop-weed competition pressure. Although it is recognized that the weed pressure associated with climate change is a significant threat to crop production, either through increased temperatures, rainfall shift, and elevated CO2 levels, the current knowledge of this effect is very sparse. A few models that have attempted to predict these interactions are discussed in this paper, since these models could play an integral role in developing future management programs for future weed threats. This review has presented a comprehensive discussion of the recent research in this area, and has identified key deficiencies which need further research in crop-weed eco-systems to formulate suitable control measures before the real impacts of climate change set in.

Keywords: agricultural; climate change; crops; management crop; vulnerabilities; weed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ainsworth E. A., Long S. P. (2005). What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 165 351–372. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alberto A. M., Ziska L. H., Cervancia C. R., Manalo P. A. (1996). The influence of increasing carbon dioxide and temperature on competitive interactions between a C3 crop, rice (Oryza sativa) and a C4 weed (Echinochloa glabrescens). Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 23 795–802. 10.1071/PP9960795 - DOI
    1. Anderson D. M., Swanton C. J., Hall J. C., Mersey B. G. (1993). The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res. 33 139–147. 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1993.tb01927.x - DOI
    1. Anwar M. P., Juraimi A. S., Puteh A., Man A., Rahman M. M. (2012). Efficacy, phytotoxicity and economics of different herbicides in aerobic rice. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 62 604–615. 10.1080/09064710.2012.681060 - DOI
    1. Asch F., Dingkuhn M., Sow A., Audebert A. (2005). Drought-induced changes in rooting patterns and assimilate partitioning between root and shoot in upland rice. Field Crops Res. 93 223–236. 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.002 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources