Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):u211571.w4730.
doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u211571.w4730. eCollection 2017.

Improving consent form documentation and introduction of procedure-specific labels in a district general hospital

Stefan Bajada  1 , Samuel Dwamena  1 , Zabihullah Abdul  1 , Rhodri Williams  1 , Owain Ennis  1
Affiliations

Improving consent form documentation and introduction of procedure-specific labels in a district general hospital

Stefan Bajada et al. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. .

Abstract

Informed consent is an important aspect in patient care. Failings in this area may result in patient dissatisfaction or litigation. The aim of this project was to assess our practice in consenting and institute changes to maintain best practice. A consecutive series of 140 patients undergoing elective and trauma procedures were randomly identified over a nine-month period. The consent forms were reviewed and the following information collected: patient/ consenter details, procedure, legibility, if copy was offered/ given to patient and adequacy of procedure-specific complications listed (scored 0-3). The issues identified included: 25% of consents were not fully legible particularly in the complications section. 62% were noted to have inadequate complications listed (score 0 [>5 risks missing]) when compared to an accepted standard. None of the consent form copies were offered or given to the patients. Focused teaching to juniors as well as procedure-specific complication stickers were implemented to improve the documentation of complications. Following several improvement cycles all consents (100%) were fully legible and had the adequate procedure-specific labels with all complications listed. There was an increase to 38% of consent forms offered to patients. We have asked surgeons in the department to comment on which consent method they prefer and all consenters felt that the procedure-specific labels where easier to read and understand. Departmental education as well as introduction of simple procedure-specific complication stickers has resulted in significant improvements in practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
“All Wales” consent form; adequacy and improvement of documentation was the aim of this study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Run-through chart showing improvement of baseline parameters over time.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Oxford English Dictionary. (2016) Consent. Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/consent. Viewed on: 18 April 2016.
    1. General Medical Council (2008) Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. Available at http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/consent_guidance_content.... Viewed on 18 April 2016.
    1. Welsh Assembly Government (2015). Patient Consent. Available at: http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/page.cfm?orgid=465&pid=11930. Viewed on 17 September 2016.
    1. Atrey A, Leslie I, Carvell J, Gupte C, Shepperd JA, Powell J, Gibb PA; British Orthopaedic Association . Standardised consent forms on the website of the British Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008. Apr;90:422–3. - PubMed
    1. Pasner KL, Severson J, Domino KB. The role of informed consent in patient complaints: Reducing hidden health systems costs and improving patient engagement through shared decision making. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management. 2015. Sep;35:38–45. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources