Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;18(8):1047-1064.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0876-8. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Switching gains and health plan price elasticities: 20 years of managed competition reforms in The Netherlands

Affiliations

Switching gains and health plan price elasticities: 20 years of managed competition reforms in The Netherlands

Rudy Douven et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

In this paper we estimate health plan price elasticities and financial switching gains for consumers over a 20-year period in which managed competition was introduced in the Dutch health insurance market. The period is characterized by a major health insurance reform in 2006 to provide health insurers with more incentives and tools to compete, and to provide consumers with a more differentiated choice of products. Prior to the reform, in the period 1995-2005, we find a low number of switchers, between 2 and 4% a year, modest average total switching gains of 2 million euros per year and short-term health plan price elasticities ranging from -0.1 to -0.4. The major reform in 2006 resulted in an all-time high switching rate of 18%, total switching gains of 130 million euros, and a high short-term price elasticity of -5.7. During 2007-2015 switching rates returned to lower levels, between 4 and 8% per year, with total switching gains in the order of 40 million euros per year on average. Total switching gains could have been 10 times higher if all consumers had switched to one of the cheapest plans. We find short-term price elasticities ranging between -0.9 and -2.2. Our estimations suggest substantial consumer inertia throughout the entire period, as we find degrees of choice persistence ranging from about 0.8 to 0.9.

Keywords: Health insurance; Health plan price elasticity; Managed competition; Switching gains.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Average annual switching gains per premium payer and annual premium variation, 1996–2015. Switching gains per premium payer (see Table 2) are displayed on the left axis and premium variation (i.e. the standard deviation of annual premiums of group and individual contracts, see Table 2) on the right axis

References

    1. Pendzialek JB, Simic D, Stock S. Differences in price elasticities of demand for health insurance: a systematic review. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2016;17:5–21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0650-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schut FT, Hassink WHJ. Managed competition and consumer price sensitivity in social health insurance. J. Health Econ. 2002;21(6):1009–1029. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00055-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schut FT, Greß S, Wasem J. Consumer price sensitivity and social health insurer choice in Germany and the Netherlands. Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ. 2003;3(2):117–138. doi: 10.1023/A:1023369231291. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Douven, R., Lieverdink, H., Ligthart, M., Vermeulen, I.: Measuring annual price elasticities in Dutch health insurance: a new method, CPB Discussion Paper 90, The Hague (2007)
    1. van Dijk M, Pomp M, Douven R, Laske-Aldershof T, Schut FT, de Boer W, de Boo A. Consumer price sensitivity in Dutch health insurance. Int. J. Health Care Finance Econ. 2008;8(4):225–244. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9038-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources