Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;137(4):549-556.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2649-3. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Treatment of acetabular fractures in older patients-introduction of a new implant for primary total hip arthroplasty

Affiliations

Treatment of acetabular fractures in older patients-introduction of a new implant for primary total hip arthroplasty

H Resch et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Fractures of the acetabulum in younger patients are commonly treated by open reduction and internal fixation. For elderly patients, stable primary total hip arthroplasty with the advantage of immediate postoperative mobilization might be the adequate treatment. For this purpose, a sufficiently stable fixation of the acetabular component is required.

Materials and methods: Between August 2009 and 2014, 30 cases were reported in which all patients underwent total hip arthroplasty additionally to a customized implant designed as an antiprotrusion cage. Inclusion criteria were an acetabular fracture with or without a previous hemiarthroplasty, age above 65 years, and pre-injury mobility dependent on a walking frame at the most. The median age was 79.9 years (65-92), and of 30 fractures, 25 were primary acetabular fractures (83%), four periprosthetic acetabular fractures (14%), and one non-union after a failed ORIF (3%).

Results: The average time from injury to surgery was 9.4 days (3-23) and 295 days for the non-union case. Mean time of surgery was 154.4 min (range 100 to 303). In 21 cases (70%), mobilization with full weight bearing was possible within the first 10 days. Six patients died before the follow-up examination 3 and 6 months after surgery, while 24 patients underwent radiologic examination showing consolidated fractures in bi-plane radiographs. In 9 patients, additional CT scan was performed which confirmed the radiographical results. 13 had regained their pre-injury level of mobility including the non-union case. Only one patient did not regain independent mobility. Four complications were recognized with necessary surgical revision (one prosthetic head dislocation, one pelvic cement leakage, one femoral shaft fracture, and one infected hematoma).

Conclusion: The presented cage provides the possibility of early mobilization with full weight bearing which represents a valuable addition to the treatment spectrum in this challenging patient group.

Keywords: Acetabular fracture; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Customized acetabulum Roof-Reinforcement Plate showing the outer (a) and inner (b) surface with srews
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Preoperative a.p. X-ray of a transverse acetabular fracture on the right side in a 79-year-old female. b Posterior view of a 3D-CT scan. c Intraoperative appearance of fracture. d Reaming of the fractured acetabulum up to 52 mm in diameter. e Custom-built Roof-Reinforcement Plate fixed with angle stable 3.5 mm screws. f Bone graft taken from the femoral head padding the cavity of the acetabulum. g Cemented 48 mm polyethylen inlay. h Postoperative a.p. X-ray

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary Report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:1615–1646. doi: 10.2106/00004623-196446080-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(11):1632–1645. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, Rolauffs B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Stuby FM. Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU) Injury. 2010;41(8):839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mears DC. Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7(2):128–141. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199903000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aprato A, Joeris A, Tosto F, Kalampoki V, Stucchi A, Masse A. Direct and indirect costs of surgically treated pelvic fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(3):325–330. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2373-9. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources