Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar;22(3):198-204.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1259374. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

Communication Among Melanoma Family Members

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Communication Among Melanoma Family Members

Deborah J Bowen et al. J Health Commun. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Interventions to improve communication among family members may facilitate information flow about familial risk and preventive health behaviors. This is a secondary analysis of the effects of an interactive website intervention aimed at increasing communication frequency and agreement about health risk among melanoma families. Participants were family units, consisting of one family member with melanoma identified from a previous research study (the Case) and an additional first degree relative and a parent of a child 0-17. Family triads were randomized to receive access to the website intervention or to serve as control families. Family communication frequency and agreement about melanoma prevention behaviors and beliefs were measured at baseline and again at 1 year post randomization. Intervention participants of all three types significantly increased the frequency of communication to their first degree relatives (Parents, siblings, children; range = 14-18 percentage points; all p < .05). At baseline, approximately two-thirds of all three family members talked with at least some member of the family about cancer risk. Agreement between Cases and First Degree Relatives and between Cases and Parents increased from pre to post intervention in the intervention participants compared to the control participants (p < .05). These findings provide support for interventions to improve family communication about cancer risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acheson LS. Recording, interpreting, and updating the family history of cancer: implications for cancer prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011 Jul 13;306(2):208–10. - PubMed
    1. Albrecht TL, Penner LA, Cline RJ, Eggly SS, Ruckdeschel JC. Studying the Process of Clinical Communication: Issues of Context, Concepts, and Research Directions. Journal of Health Communication. 2009;14:1, 47–56. - PubMed
    1. Anton-Culver H, et al. The Cancer Genetics Network: recruitment results and pilot studies. Community Genet. 2003;6(3):171–7. - PubMed
    1. Berg AO, Baird MA, Botkin JR, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: family history and improving health. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;151(12):872–7. - PubMed
    1. Bodurtha JN, McClish D, Gyure M, Corona R, Krist AH, Rodríguez VM, Maibauer AM, Borzelleca J, Jr, Bowen DJ, Quillin JM. The KinFact Intervention – A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Family Communication About Cancer History. Journal of Women’s Health. 2014 Oct;23(10):806–816. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources