A three-long noncoding RNA signature as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating between triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancers
- PMID: 28248879
- PMCID: PMC5340452
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006222
A three-long noncoding RNA signature as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating between triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancers
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer with unfavorable outcome and it is useful to explore noninvasive biomarkers for its early diagnosis. Here, we identified differentially expressed long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in blood samples of patients with TNBC to assess their diagnostic value.
Methods: Differential expression of lncRNAs in plasma of patients with TNBC (n = 25) and non-TNBC (NTNBC; n = 35) and in healthy controls was compared by microarray analysis and validated by real-time PCR. lncRNA expression between plasma and BC tissues was compared using Pearson correlation test. Logit model was used to obtain a new lncRNA-based score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of the selected lncRNAs.
Results: Microarray data showed that 41 lncRNAs were aberrantly expressed. Among these, antisense noncoding RNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL), hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha antisense RNA-2 (HIF1A-AS2), and urothelial carcinoma-associated 1 (UCA1) were markedly upregulated in plasma of patients with TNBC compared with patients with NTNBC (P < 0.01). HIF1A-AS2 expression was positively associated with its tissue levels (r = 0.670, P < 0.01). AUC (95% CI) of ANRIL, HIF1A-AS2, and UCA1 was 0.785 (0.660-0.881), 0.739 (0.610-0.844), and 0.817 (0.696-0.905), respectively. TNBCSigLnc-3, a new score obtained using the logit model, showed excellent diagnostic performance, with AUC of 0.934 (0.839-0.982), sensitivity of 76.0%, and specificity of 97.1%.
Conclusion: ANRIL, HIF1A-AS2, and UCA1 expression was significantly increased in plasma of patients with TNBC, suggesting their use as TNBC-specific diagnostic biomarkers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Long non-coding RNAs: implications in targeted diagnoses, prognosis, and improved therapeutic strategies in human non- and triple-negative breast cancer.Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Jun 27;10:88. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0514-z. eCollection 2018. Clin Epigenetics. 2018. PMID: 29983835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comprehensive analysis of novel three-long noncoding RNA signatures as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of human triple-negative breast cancer.J Cell Biochem. 2019 Mar;120(3):3185-3196. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27584. Epub 2018 Sep 11. J Cell Biochem. 2019. PMID: 30203490
-
HIF1A-AS2 predicts poor prognosis and regulates cell migration and invasion in triple-negative breast cancer.J Cell Biochem. 2019 Jun;120(6):10513-10518. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28337. Epub 2019 Jan 11. J Cell Biochem. 2019. PMID: 30635931
-
LncRNAs as new biomarkers to differentiate triple negative breast cancer from non-triple negative breast cancer.Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):13047-59. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7509. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 26910840 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Value of Differentially Expressed LncRNAs in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2020;30(5):447-456. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2020035836. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2020. PMID: 33389881
Cited by
-
Long non-coding RNAs: implications in targeted diagnoses, prognosis, and improved therapeutic strategies in human non- and triple-negative breast cancer.Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Jun 27;10:88. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0514-z. eCollection 2018. Clin Epigenetics. 2018. PMID: 29983835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Two Components of Propolis: Caffeic Acid (CA) and Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) Induce Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest of Breast Cancer Cells MDA-MB-231.Molecules. 2017 Sep 15;22(9):1554. doi: 10.3390/molecules22091554. Molecules. 2017. PMID: 28926932 Free PMC article.
-
Roles of miRNA and lncRNA in triple-negative breast cancer.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020 Sept.;21(9):673-689. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1900709. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020. PMID: 32893525 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long Non-Coding RNAs as Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Progress and Prospects.Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 30;11:710538. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.710538. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34527584 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regulatory miRNAs, circRNAs and lncRNAs in cell cycle progression of breast cancer.Funct Integr Genomics. 2023 Jul 11;23(3):233. doi: 10.1007/s10142-023-01130-z. Funct Integr Genomics. 2023. PMID: 37432486 Review.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5–29. - PubMed
-
- Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1938–48. - PubMed
-
- Yin WJ, Lu JS, Di GH, et al. Clinicopathological features of the triple-negative tumors in Chinese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;115:325–33. - PubMed
-
- Basso SM, Santeufemia DA, Fadda GM, et al. Advances in the treatment of triple-negative early breast cancer. Med Chem 2016;12:268–72. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical