Central aortic pressure calibration: "a bridge too far"?

Affiliations

Comment

Audrey Adji et al. J Hypertens. 2017 Apr.

. 2017 Apr;35(4):893-894.

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001246.

¹ aSt Vincent's Clinic bFMHS, Macquarie University cUniversity of New South Wales/VCCRI, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

No abstract available

Comment in

Reply.
Papaioannou TG, Karageorgopoulou TD, Sergentanis TN, Protogerou AD, Psaltopoulou T, Sharman JE, Weber T, Blacher J, Daskalopoulou SS, Wassertheurer S, Khir AW, Vlachopoulos C, Stergiopulos N, Stefanadis C, Nichols WW, Tousoulis D. Papaioannou TG, et al. J Hypertens. 2017 Apr;35(4):894-896. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001247. J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 28248906 No abstract available.

Accuracy of commercial devices and methods for noninvasive estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure a systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive validation studies.
Papaioannou TG, Karageorgopoulou TD, Sergentanis TN, Protogerou AD, Psaltopoulou T, Sharman JE, Weber T, Blacher J, Daskalopoulou SS, Wassertheurer S, Khir AW, Vlachopoulos C, Stergiopulos N, Stefanadis C, Nichols WW, Tousoulis D. Papaioannou TG, et al. J Hypertens. 2016 Jul;34(7):1237-48. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000921. J Hypertens. 2016. PMID: 27136312
Validation of noninvasive devices for central blood pressure assessment: a yet unresolved issue.
Salvi P, Grillo A, Parati G. Salvi P, et al. J Hypertens. 2016 Jul;34(7):1249-51. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000970. J Hypertens. 2016. PMID: 27254142 No abstract available.