Cross-education after high-frequency versus low-frequency volume-matched handgrip training
- PMID: 28249351
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.25637
Cross-education after high-frequency versus low-frequency volume-matched handgrip training
Abstract
Introduction: Cross-education training programs cause interlimb asymmetry of strength and hypertrophy. We examined the cross-education effects from a high-frequency (HF) versus a low-frequency (LF) volume-matched handgrip training program on interlimb asymmetry.
Methods: Right-handed participants completed either HF (n = 10; 2 × 6 repetitions 10 times per week) or LF (n = 9; 5 × 8 repetitions 3 times per week) training. Testing occurred twice before and once after 4 weeks of right-handed isometric handgrip training totaling 120 weekly repetitions. Measures were maximal isometric handgrip and wrist flexion torque, muscle thickness, and muscle activation (electromyography; EMG).
Results: Grip strength was greater in both limbs posttraining, pooled across groups (P < 0.001). Trained limb muscle thickness increased in both groups (P < 0.05; untrained, P = 0.897). EMG and wrist flexion torque did not change (all P > 0.103).
Discussion: Both LF and HF induced cross-education of grip strength to the untrained limb, but HF did not reduce asymmetry. These findings have implications for injury rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve 56: 689-695, 2017.
Keywords: cross education; grip strength; interlimb asymmetry; neuromuscular physiology; strength rehabilitation; strength training frequency.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Prescribing cross-education of strength: Is it time?Muscle Nerve. 2017 Oct;56(4):684-685. doi: 10.1002/mus.25665. Epub 2017 May 31. Muscle Nerve. 2017. PMID: 28407340 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
