Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):1377-1383.
doi: 10.1534/g3.117.040717.

Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon

Affiliations

Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon

Hsin-Yuan Tsai et al. G3 (Bethesda). .

Abstract

Genomic selection uses genome-wide marker information to predict breeding values for traits of economic interest, and is more accurate than pedigree-based methods. The development of high density SNP arrays for Atlantic salmon has enabled genomic selection in selective breeding programs, alongside high-resolution association mapping of the genetic basis of complex traits. However, in sibling testing schemes typical of salmon breeding programs, trait records are available on many thousands of fish with close relationships to the selection candidates. Therefore, routine high density SNP genotyping may be prohibitively expensive. One means to reducing genotyping cost is the use of genotype imputation, where selected key animals (e.g., breeding program parents) are genotyped at high density, and the majority of individuals (e.g., performance tested fish and selection candidates) are genotyped at much lower density, followed by imputation to high density. The main objectives of the current study were to assess the feasibility and accuracy of genotype imputation in the context of a salmon breeding program. The specific aims were: (i) to measure the accuracy of genotype imputation using medium (25 K) and high (78 K) density mapped SNP panels, by masking varying proportions of the genotypes and assessing the correlation between the imputed genotypes and the true genotypes; and (ii) to assess the efficacy of imputed genotype data in genomic prediction of key performance traits (sea lice resistance and body weight). Imputation accuracies of up to 0.90 were observed using the simple two-generation pedigree dataset, and moderately high accuracy (0.83) was possible even with very low density SNP data (∼250 SNPs). The performance of genomic prediction using imputed genotype data was comparable to using true genotype data, and both were superior to pedigree-based prediction. These results demonstrate that the genotype imputation approach used in this study can provide a cost-effective method for generating robust genome-wide SNP data for genomic prediction in Atlantic salmon. Genotype imputation approaches are likely to form a critical component of cost-efficient genomic selection programs to improve economically important traits in aquaculture.

Keywords: GenPred; Genomic Selection; Shared Data Resources; aquaculture; disease resistance; imputation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of minor allele frequency on imputation accuracy. The plot shows the imputation accuracy for the MD SNP panel with the two different LD SNP panel densities (90% SNPs masked = 2563 SNPs; 99% SNPs masked = 256 SNPs), plotted against the minor allele frequency of the SNPs using a local regression fit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation of imputation accuracies across individual animals in MD SNP panel. The histograms show bins of imputation accuracy (x-axis), and the number of animals in those bins (y-axis) for the two different LD SNP panel densities (90% SNPs masked = 2563 SNPs; 99% SNPs masked = 256 SNPs).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Breeding value prediction accuracies for (A) sea lice resistance and (B) body weight calculated using (i) the pedigree (PBLUP), compared to genomic prediction using (ii) the 256 SNP LD panel only, (iii) the 256 SNP LD panel imputed to 25 K SNPs (with all parents and 25% offspring genotyped at MD SNP panel), and (iv) the true genotypes for the 25 K MD SNP panel. For comparison, the accuracy of breeding value prediction under scenario (iv) is shown by the blue dashed line, and the corresponding accuracy under scenario (i) with the red dashed line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antolín R., Nettelblad C., Gorjanc G., Money D., Hickey J. M., 2017. A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 49: 30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baird N. A., Etter P. D., Atwood T. S., Currey M. C., Shiver A. L., et al. , 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3: e3376. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry D. P., Kearney J. F., 2011. Imputation of genotypes from low- to high-density genotyping platforms and implications for genomic selection. Animal 5: 1162–1169. - PubMed
    1. Browning B. L., Browning S. R., 2016. Genotype imputation with millions of reference samples. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98: 116–126. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Correa K., Lhorente J. P., Bassini L., Lopez M. E., Di Genova A., et al. , 2016. Genome wide association study for resistance to Caligus rogercresseyi in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) using a 50K SNP genotyping array. Aquaculture (in press).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources