Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2017;56(5):481-485.
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7563. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

The Type of Vascular Access and the Incidence of Mortality in Japanese Dialysis Patients

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

The Type of Vascular Access and the Incidence of Mortality in Japanese Dialysis Patients

Toshikazu Ozeki et al. Intern Med. 2017.

Abstract

Objective The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines have recommended the use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) at the initiation of dialysis. However, there are significant differences in the dialysis environments of Japan and the United States, and there are few people who receive hemodialysis via a central venous catheter (CVC) in Japan. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between the type of vascular access at the initiation of dialysis and the incidence of mortality in Japan. Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. The data was collected by the Aichi Cohort study of Prognosis in Patients newly initiated into dialysis (AICOPP) in which 18 Japanese tertiary care centers participated. The present study enrolled 1,524 patients who were newly introduced to dialysis (the patients started maintenance dialysis between October 2011 and September 2013). After excluding 183 patients with missing data, 1,341 patients were enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate mortality based on the type of vascular access. The types of vascular access were divided into four categories: AVF, arteriovenous graft (AVG), CVC changed to AVF during the course (CAVF), CVC changed to AVG during the course (CAVG). Results A multivariate analysis revealed that AVG, CAVF and CAVG were associated with a higher risk of mortality in comparison to AVF [hazard ratio (HR), 1.60; p=0.048; HR, 2.26; p=0.003; and HR, 2.45; p=0.001, respectively]. Conclusion The research proved that the survival rate among patients in whom hemodialysis was initiated with AVF was significantly higher than that in patients in whom hemodialysis was initiated with AVG or CVC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A flow diagram of the present study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the type of vascular access. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the AVG, CAVF and CAVG group had significantly worse survival in comparison to those in the AVF group (p=0.00 log-rank test).

References

    1. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access, 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 37 (Suppl 1): S137-S181, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Tordoir JH, Mickley V. European guidelines for vascular access: clinical algorithms on vascular access for haemodialysis. Edtna Erca J 29: 131-136, 2003. - PubMed
    1. Oliver MJ, Rothwell DM, Fung K, Hux JE, Lok CE. Late creation of vascular access for hemodialysis and increased risk of sepsis. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1936-1942, 2004. - PubMed
    1. Pastan S, Soucie JM, McClellan WM. Vascular access and increased risk of death among hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 62: 620-626, 2002. - PubMed
    1. Xue JL, Dahl D, Ebben JP, Collins AJ. The association of initial hemodialysis access type with mortality outcomes in elderly Medicare ESRD patients. Am J Kidney Dis 42: 1013-1019, 2003. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms