Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan;34(1):10-20.
doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2015.1461. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

Changing Trends in Gastric Cancer Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Changing Trends in Gastric Cancer Surgery

İlter Özer et al. Balkan Med J. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Gastric cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. It requires multimodal treatment and surgery is the most effective treatment modality. Radical surgery includes total or subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. The extent of lymphadenectomy still remains controversial. Eastern surgeons have performed D2 or more extended lymphadenectomy while their Western colleagues have performed more limited lymph node dissection. However, the trend has been changing in favour of D2 lymph node dissection in both hemispheres. Currently, D2 is the recommended type of lymphadenectomy in experienced centres in the west. In Japan, D2 lymph node dissection is the standard surgical approach. More extensive lymphadenectomy than D2 has not been found to be associated with improved survival and generally is not performed. Bursectomy and splenectomy are additional controversial issues in surgical performance, and trends regarding them will be discussed. The performance of bursectomy is controversial and there is no clear evidence of its clinical benefit. However, a trend toward better survival in patients with serosal invasion has been reported. Routine splenectomy as a part of lymph node dissection has largely been abandoned, although splenectomy is recommended in selected cases. Minimally invasive surgery has gained wide popularity and indications for minimally invasive procedures have been expanding due to increasing experience and improving technology. Neoadjuvant therapy has been shown to have beneficial effects and seems necessary to provide a survival benefit. Diagnostic laparoscopy should be kept in mind prior to treatment.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; bursectomy; lymph node dissection; minimally invasive surgery; splenectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yoon SS, Yang HK. Lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: should west meet the east? Oncologist. 2009;14:871–82. - PubMed
    1. Diggory RT, Cuschieri A. R2,3 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: an audited experience of a consecutive series. Br J Surg. 1985;72:146–8. - PubMed
    1. Kampschöer GH, Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Okabayashi K. Computer analysis in making preoperative decisions: a rational approach to lymph node dissection in gastric cancer patients. Br J Surg. 1989;76:905–908. - PubMed
    1. Isozaki H, Okajima K, Kawashima Y, Yamada S, Nakata E, Nishimura J, et al. Prognostic value of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer with radical surgery. J Surg Oncol. 1993;53:247–51. - PubMed
    1. Isozaki H, Okajima K, Fujii K, Nomura E, Izumi N, Mabuchi H, et al. Effectiveness of paraaortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:549–54. - PubMed