Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Sep;95(6):551-566.
doi: 10.1111/aos.13403. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Shuyu Xiong et al. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Outdoor time is considered to reduce the risk of developing myopia. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence for association between time outdoors and (1) risk of onset of myopia (incident/prevalent myopia); (2) risk of a myopic shift in refractive error and c) risk of progression in myopes only. A systematic review followed by a meta-analysis and a dose-response analysis of relevant evidence from literature was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant papers. Of the 51 articles with relevant data, 25 were included in the meta-analysis and dose-response analysis. Twenty-three of the 25 articles involved children. Risk ratio (RR) for binary variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables were conducted. Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to pool the data for meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test with I2 ≥ 50% considered to indicate high heterogeneity. Additionally, subgroup analyses (based on participant's age, prevalence of myopia and study type) and sensitivity analyses were conducted. A significant protective effect of outdoor time was found for incident myopia (clinical trials: risk ratio (RR) = 0.536, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.338 to 0.850; longitudinal cohort studies: RR = 0.574, 95% CI = 0.395 to 0.834) and prevalent myopia (cross-sectional studies: OR = 0.964, 95% CI = 0.945 to 0.982). With dose-response analysis, an inverse nonlinear relationship was found with increased time outdoors reducing the risk of incident myopia. Also, pooled results from clinical trials indicated that when outdoor time was used as an intervention, there was a reduced myopic shift of -0.30 D (in both myopes and nonmyopes) compared with the control group (WMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.18 to -0.41) after 3 years of follow-up. However, when only myopes were considered, dose-response analysis did not find a relationship between time outdoors and myopic progression (R2 = 0.00064). Increased time outdoors is effective in preventing the onset of myopia as well as in slowing the myopic shift in refractive error. But paradoxically, outdoor time was not effective in slowing progression in eyes that were already myopic. Further studies evaluating effect of outdoor in various doses and objective measurements of time outdoors may help improve our understanding of the role played by outdoors in onset and management of myopia.

Keywords: dose-response analysis; meta-analysis; myopia; outdoor time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot corresponding to main random‐effects meta‐analysis performed to quantify the relationship between the time spent on outdoor activities and the incidence or prevalence of myopia. All statistical tests were two‐sided. CI = confidence interval. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose–response analysis of the time spent outdoors and the risk of myopia (y: risk ratio; and x: increased time spent outdoors). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup analysis of the trials included to assess the relationship between outdoor activities and the myopia incidence or prevalence, CI = confidence interval, RR = relative risk, OR = odds ratio, RCT = randomized clinical trial, and CCT = controlled clinical trial. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot corresponding to main random‐effects meta‐analysis performed to quantify the mean difference in myopic shift in refraction in the whole sample between the intervention group, with increased time spent outdoors, and the control group. All statistical tests were two‐sided. CI = confidence interval, and WMD = weighted mean difference. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Dose–response analysis of the time spent outdoors and myopic progression rate (y: treatment effect or annual myopic progression, and x: increased time spent outdoors). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].

References

    1. Bar Dayan Y, Levin A, Morad Y et al. (2005): The changing prevalence of myopia in young adults: a 13‐year series of population‐based prevalence surveys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 2760–2765. - PubMed
    1. Berntsen DA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO & Zadnik K (2012): A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53: 640–649. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen C, Cheung SW & Cho P (2013): Myopia control using toric orthokeratology (TO‐SEE study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54: 6510–6517. - PubMed
    1. Cheng CY, Huang W, Su KC, Peng ML, Sun HY & Cheng HM (2013): Myopization factors affecting urban elementary school students in Taiwan. Optom Vis Sci 90: 400–406. - PubMed
    1. Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A & Tan D (2012): Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2). Ophthalmology 119: 347–354. - PubMed