Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 7;69(9):1129-1142.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.081.

Relationship Between Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Risk of Heart Failure

Affiliations

Relationship Between Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Risk of Heart Failure

Ambarish Pandey et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Lower leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and higher body mass index (BMI) are independently associated with risk of heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if this relationship is consistent for both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Objectives: This study sought to quantify dose-response associations between LTPA, BMI, and the risk of different HF subtypes.

Methods: Individual-level data from 3 cohort studies (WHI [Women's Health Initiative], MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis], and CHS [Cardiovascular Health Study]) were pooled and participants were stratified into guideline-recommended categories of LTPA and BMI. Associations between LTPA, BMI, and risk of overall HF, HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥45%), and HFrEF (ejection fraction <45%) were assessed by using multivariable adjusted Cox models and restricted cubic splines.

Results: The study included 51,451 participants with 3,180 HF events (1,252 HFpEF, 914 HFrEF, and 1,014 unclassified HF). In the adjusted analysis, there was a dose-dependent association between higher LTPA levels, lower BMI, and overall HF risk. Among HF subtypes, LTPA in any dose range was not associated with HFrEF risk. In contrast, lower levels of LTPA (<500 MET-min/week) were not associated with HFpEF risk, and dose-dependent associations with lower HFpEF risk were observed at higher levels. Compared with no LTPA, higher than twice the guideline-recommended minimum LTPA levels (>1,000 MET-min/week) were associated with an 19% lower risk of HFpEF (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.97). The dose-response relationship for BMI with HFpEF risk was also more consistent than with HFrEF risk, such that increasing BMI above the normal range (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with a greater increase in risk of HFpEF than HFrEF.

Conclusions: Our study findings show strong, dose-dependent associations between LTPA levels, BMI, and risk of overall HF. Among HF subtypes, higher LTPA levels and lower BMI were more consistently associated with lower risk of HFpEF compared with HFrEF.

Keywords: body mass index; dose–response relationship; heart failure; physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Cohort Derivation for the Pooled Analysis
The flowchart shows the derivation of the final study population from each of the 3 cohorts: the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI); Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA); and Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). HF = heart failure; LTPA = leisure time physical activity; MI = myocardial infarction; UNC = University of North Carolina.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Risk of HF Subtypes by LTPA and BMI Categories
Kaplan-Meier plots here show the unadjusted cumulative incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across different LTPA A,B and BMI C,D) groups. BMI = body mass index; HF = heart failure; HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LTPA = leisure time physical activity; MET = metabolic equivalent.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. Continuous Association Between LTPA Levels and Risk of HF Subtypes
Restricted cubic splines showing continuous adjusted association between LTPA levels (MET-min/week) and risk of HFrEF (top panel) and HFpEF (bottom panel). The shaded area shows the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio point estimates associated with different LTPA levels. MET = metabolic equivalent. Other abbreviations as in Figure 2.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4. Continuous Association Between BMI and Risk of HF Subtypes
Restricted cubic splines showing continuous adjusted association between BMI (kg/m2) and risk of HFrEF (top panel) and HFpEF (bottom panel). The shaded area shows the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio point estimates associated with different LTPA levels. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2012 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:e2–e220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhingra A, Garg A, Kaur S, et al. Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014;11:354–65. - PubMed
    1. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, et al. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:260–9. - PubMed
    1. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:251–9. - PubMed
    1. Holland DJ, Kumbhani DJ, Ahmed SH, Marwick TH. Effects of treatment on exercise tolerance, cardiac function, and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1676–86. - PubMed

Grants and funding