Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;9(3):e23.
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001177. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Patient values informing medical treatment: a pilot community and advance care planning survey

Affiliations

Patient values informing medical treatment: a pilot community and advance care planning survey

S Milnes et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Medicine regards the prevention of death as an important priority. Yet patients may have a range of priorities of equal or greater importance. These other priorities are often not discussed or appreciated by treating doctors.

Objectives: We sought to identify priorities of care for patients attending an advance care planning (ACP) clinic and among the general population, and to identify factors associated with priorities other than prolonging life.

Methods: We used a locally developed survey tool 'What Matters Most' to identify values. Choices presented were: maintaining dignity, avoiding pain and suffering, living as long as possible, and remaining independent. Participants rated the importance of each and then selected a main priority for their doctor. Participant groups were a purposive sample of 382 lay people from the general population and 100 attendees at an ACP clinic.

Results: Living as long as possible was considered to be less important than other values for ACP patients and for the general population. Only 4% of ACP patients surveyed and 2.6% of our general population sample selected 'living as long as possible' as their top priority for medical treatment.

Conclusions: 'Living as long as possible' was not the most important value for ACP patients, or for a younger general population. Prioritisation of other goals appeared to be independent of extreme age or illness. When end of life treatment is being discussed with patients, priorities other than merely prolonging life should be considered.

Keywords: Advance Care Planning; Clinical decisions; Communication; Ethics; Quality of life; Values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Information given to all participants both on-line survey and hard copy.

References

    1. Jason L. “What matters to me”—a new vital sign. In: Talks T. TEDxGlasgow, 2016.
    1. Gillick MR. Re-engineering shared decision-making. J Med Ethics 2015;41:785–8. 10.1136/medethics-2014-102618 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2014;94:291–309. 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Kleffens T, Van Leeuwen E. Physicians’ evaluations of patients’ decisions to refuse oncological treatment. J Med Ethics 2005;31:131–6. 10.1136/jme.2004.008755 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried TR. Shared decision making—finding the sweet spot. N Engl J Med 2016;374:104–6. 10.1056/NEJMp1510020 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources