Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017:2017:9403821.
doi: 10.1155/2017/9403821. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Development of a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model for Predicting Implant Failure in Pelvic Ring Fracture Fixation

Affiliations
Observational Study

Development of a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model for Predicting Implant Failure in Pelvic Ring Fracture Fixation

Vickie Shim et al. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017.

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction. The main purpose of this study is to develop an efficient technique for generating FE models of pelvic ring fractures that is capable of predicting possible failure regions of osteosynthesis with acceptable accuracy. Methods. Patient-specific FE models of two patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures were generated. A validated FE model of an uninjured pelvis from our previous study was used as a master model. Then, fracture morphologies and implant positions defined by a trauma surgeon in the preoperative CT were manually introduced as 3D splines to the master model. Four loading cases were used as boundary conditions. Regions of high stresses in the models were compared with actual locations of implant breakages and loosening identified from follow-up X-rays. Results. Model predictions and the actual clinical outcomes matched well. For Patient A, zones of increased tension and maximum stress coincided well with the actual locations of implant loosening. For Patient B, the model predicted accurately the loosening of the implant in the anterior region. Conclusion. Since a significant reduction in time and labour was achieved in our mesh generation technique, it can be considered as a viable option to be implemented as a part of the clinical routine to aid presurgical planning and postsurgical management of pelvic ring fracture patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Postoperative X-ray 6 months after surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postoperative X-ray 3 months after surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Four load cases simulated in this study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of methods for FE model creation for completely patient-specific analysis (a) and for efficient patient-specific analysis (b).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Tension ((a) in MPa, minimum 0.086 MPa, maximum 155.07 MPa) and deformation ((b) mm, minimum 0.0247 mm, maximum 0.305 mm) along the transiliosacral screw at the posterior pelvic ring.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Zone of maximum tension at the infra-acetabular screw ((a) in MPa, minimum 0.0 MPa, maximum 86.816 MPa) and deformation ((b) mm, minimum 1.87 mm maximum 2.381 mm) at the plate near the right symphysis at the anterior pelvic ring.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Zones of maximum tension ((a) MPa, minimum 0.0225 MPa, maximum 101.66 MPa) and deformation ((b) mm, minimum 0.0259 mm and maximum 0.71952 mm) at the osteosynthesis of the posterior pelvic ring.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Zone of maximum tension (MPa, minimum 0.0 MPa, maximum 24.756 MPa) at the osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic ring for Patient B.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Deformation (mm) at the plate near the right (minimum 0.816 mm, maximum 1.18 mm) (a) and left symphysis (b) at the anterior pelvic ring for Patient B (minimum 0.765 mm, maximum 1.585 mm).

References

    1. McCormick J. P., Morgan S. J., Smith W. R. Clinical effectiveness of the physical examination in diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring injuries. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2003;17(4):257–261. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200304000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gänsslen A. Biomechanical principles for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis. Der Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(4):272–280. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1763-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goulet J. A., Rouleau J. P., Mason D. J., Goldstein S. A. Comminuted fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. A biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume. 1994;76(10):1457–1463. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199410000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mears S. C., Sutter E. G., Wall S. J., Rose D. M., Belkoff S. M. Biomechanical comparison of three methods of sacral fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Spine. 2010;35(10):E392–E395. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb4fcd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams R. P., Friis E. A., Cooke F. W., McQueen D. A., Toohey J. S. External fixation of unstable malgaigne fractures: the comparative mechanical performance of a new configuration. Orthopaedic Review. 1992;21(12):1423–1430. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources