Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;26(5):902-933.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0082-y. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling

Barbara A Athens  1 , Samantha L Caldwell  1 , Kendall L Umstead  1 , Philip D Connors  1 , Ethan Brenna  1 , Barbara B Biesecker  2
Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling

Barbara A Athens et al. J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

With the advancements in precision medicine and health care reform, it is critical that genetic counseling practice respond to emerging evidence to maximize client benefit. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence on outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of genetic counseling to inform clinical practice. Seven databases were searched in conducting this review. Studies were selected for inclusion if they were: (a) RCTs published from 1990 to 2015, and (b) assessed a direct outcome of genetic counseling. Extracted data included study population, aims, and outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines. A review of 1654 abstracts identified 58 publications of 54 unique RCTs that met inclusion criteria, the vast majority of which were conducted in cancer genetic counseling setting. Twenty-seven publications assessed 'enhancements' to genetic counseling, and 31 publications compared delivery modes. The methodological rigor varied considerably, highlighting the need for attention to quality criteria in RCT design. While most studies assessed several client outcomes hypothesized to be affected by genetic counseling (e.g., psychological wellbeing, knowledge, perceived risk, patient satisfaction), disparate validated and reliable scales and other assessments were often used to evaluate the same outcome(s). This limits opportunity to compare findings across studies. While RCTs of genetic counseling demonstrate enhanced client outcomes in a number of studies and pave the way to evidence-based practice, the heterogeneity of the research questions suggest an important need for more complementary studies with consistent outcome assessments.

Keywords: Evidence-based practice; Genetic counseling; Genetic counseling outcomes; Genetics knowledge; Patient outcomes; Patient satisfaction; Psychological wellbeing; Randomized controlled trials; Risk perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Barbara A. Athens has no conflict of interest to declare. Samantha L. Caldwell has no conflict of interest to declare. Kendall L. Umstead has no conflict of interest to declare. Philip D. Connors has no conflict of interest to declare. Ethan Brenna has no conflict of interest to declare. Barbara B. Biesecker has no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A visual representation of the process of selecting the 58 publications (reporting on 54 unique RCTs) included in this review from the 1654 abstracts returned by the literature search
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Albada A, van Dulmen S, Spreeuwenberg P, & Ausems MG (2015). Follow-up effects of a tailored pre-counseling website with question prompt in breast cancer genetic counseling. Patient Education and Counseling, 98, 69–76. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barton S (2000). Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study. The BMJ, 321, 255–256. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett P, Phelps C, Brain K, Hood K, & Gray J (2007). A randomized controlled trial of a brief self-help coping intervention designed to reduce distress when awaiting genetic risk information. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 63, 59–64. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.01.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt BA, Biesecker BB, & Mastromarino CL (2000). Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: Client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 94(3), 189–197. - PubMed
    1. Biesecker BB (2001). Goals of genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 60, 323–330. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms