Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;40(1 suppl 1):200-208.
doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0055. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Salt stress affects mRNA editing in soybean chloroplasts

Affiliations

Salt stress affects mRNA editing in soybean chloroplasts

Nureyev F Rodrigues et al. Genet Mol Biol. 2017.

Abstract

Soybean, a crop known by its economic and nutritional importance, has been the subject of several studies that assess the impact and the effective plant responses to abiotic stresses. Salt stress is one of the main environmental stresses and negatively impacts crop growth and yield. In this work, the RNA editing process in the chloroplast of soybean plants was evaluated in response to a salt stress. Bioinformatics approach using sRNA and mRNA libraries were employed to detect specific sites showing differences in editing efficiency. RT-qPCR was used to measure editing efficiency at selected sites. We observed that transcripts of NDHA, NDHB, RPS14 and RPS16 genes presented differences in coverage and editing rates between control and salt-treated libraries. RT-qPCR assays demonstrated an increase in editing efficiency of selected genes. The salt stress enhanced the RNA editing process in transcripts, indicating responses to components of the electron transfer chain, photosystem and translation complexes. These increases can be a response to keep the homeostasis of chloroplast protein functions in response to salt stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of qPCR analysis of RNA editing frequency showing relative locations of (A) specific-reverse and (B) specific-forward qPCR primers. Arrows depict the annealing sites of qPCR primers.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Boxplot indicating the editing of (a) NDHB-149, (b) PSBF-77, (c) RPS14-80, and (d) RPS16-212 sites of control and salt stress plants, in 4h and 24 hours treatment. Box area represents the lower and the upper percentiles. The upper whisker of the boxplot indicates the highest editing value observed; the lower whisker, the lowest editing value; and the middle line, the median editing value. Asterisk indicate significantly different values at P < 0.05.

References

    1. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106–R106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkan A. Expression of plastid genes: Organelle-specific elaborations on a prokaryotic scaffold. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:1520–1532. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkan A, Small I. Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:415–442. - PubMed
    1. Boussardon C, Avon A, Kindgren P, Bond CS, Challenor M, Lurin C, Small I. The cytidine deaminase signature HxE(x)(n)CxxC of DYW1 binds zinc and is necessary for RNA editing of ndhD-1. New Phytol. 2014;203:1090–1095. - PubMed
    1. Cai W, Ji D, Peng L, Guo J, Ma J, Zou M, Lu C, Zhang L. LPA66 Is required for editing psbF chloroplast transcripts in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1260–1271. - PMC - PubMed