A comparison of results of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians to younger patients from the Mid-America Vascular Study Group and the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative
- PMID: 28259574
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.118
A comparison of results of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians to younger patients from the Mid-America Vascular Study Group and the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative
Abstract
Objective: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces stroke risk in selected patients. However, CEA risk profile may be different in older patients. We compared characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians with those of younger patients.
Methods: Deidentified data from CEA patients were obtained from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database. Prior CEA, carotid artery stent, or combined CEA and coronary artery bypass were excluded, yielding 7390 CEAs in octogenarians and nonagenarians (≥80 years of age) and 35,303 CEAs in younger patients (<80 years of age). We compared post-CEA outcomes, including periprocedural cerebral ischemic events and death, and details such as operative time, bleeding, and return to surgery.
Results: Octogenarians and nonagenarians were more likely to have pre-CEA neurologic symptoms (51.4% vs 45.6%; P < .001) and to have never smoked (37.8% vs 22.0%; P < .001), and they were slightly more likely to have required urgent CEA (16.1% vs 13.4%; P < .001). Stenosis ≥70% was similar (octogenarians and nonagenarians, 94.2%; younger patients, 94.4%; P = .45). Perioperative ipsilateral neurologic events and ipsilateral stroke were slightly more common among octogenarians and nonagenarians (1.6% vs 1.1% [P < .001] and 1.2% vs 0.8% [P = .002]). Multivariate modeling (logistic regression) showed that pre-CEA neurologic symptoms (odds ratios, 1.35 [P = .005] and 1.42 [P = .007]), pre-CEA ipsilateral cortical ischemic event (odds ratios, 1.18 [P < .001] and 1.20 [P < .001]), and urgency (odds ratios, 1.75 [P < .001] and 1.67 [P < .001]) remained strong predictors of any ipsilateral neurologic event and any ipsilateral stroke, respectively. However, age ≥80 years remained a significant predictor of these outcomes (odds ratios, 1.37 [P = .003] and 1.44 [P = .004]). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was lower for octogenarians and nonagenarians at 30 days and 1 year (98.6% vs 99.4% and 93.7% vs 97.0%; log-rank, P < .001). Age ≥80 years was also associated with a greater rate of discharge to other than home after CEA, a difference that was only partially explained by comorbidities in multivariate modeling.
Conclusions: CEA was performed with low rates of perioperative neurologic events and mortality. Multivariate testing showed that the higher rate of neurologic complications in octogenarians and nonagenarians appeared partially related to symptomatic status and urgent surgery; but after adjusting for these factors, age ≥80 years still predicted a slightly higher rate. Periprocedural CEA outcomes appear similar in comparing older and younger patients, although longer term survival is lower for older patients, and older patients are at greater risk of discharge to other than home. CEA was associated with slightly higher risk of neurologic complications in older patients but may be considered appropriate for selected octogenarians and nonagenarians.
Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting.J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.041. Epub 2017 Feb 9. J Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28190720
-
Safety of carotid endarterectomy in 2,443 elderly patients: lessons from nonagenarians--are we pushing the limit?J Am Coll Surg. 2005 May;200(5):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.12.012. J Am Coll Surg. 2005. PMID: 15848366
-
Characterization of perioperative contralateral stroke after carotid endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1450-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 Jul 8. J Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28697940
-
A systematic review of patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1962-1974.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.096. Epub 2019 Feb 18. J Vasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30792057
-
Literature review of primary versus patching versus eversion as carotid endarterectomy closure.J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2):666-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.051. Epub 2021 Apr 20. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33862187
Cited by
-
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians compared to their younger counterparts: a retrospective observational study.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 May;106(5):248-254. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.248. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024. PMID: 38725804 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Age on Peri-Operative Outcomes after FEVAR.J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 5;12(11):3858. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113858. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37298053 Free PMC article.
-
Association of carotid revascularization approach with perioperative outcomes based on symptom status and degree of stenosis among octogenarians.J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):769-777.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 25. J Vasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 35643202 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention and Treatment of Acute Stroke in the Nonagenarians and Beyond: Medical and Ethical Issues.Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019 May 8;21(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11940-019-0567-0. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31065827 Review.
-
Carotid Endarterectomy in the Very Elderly: Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Outcomes.Vasc Specialist Int. 2023 Sep 25;39:28. doi: 10.5758/vsi.230060. Vasc Specialist Int. 2023. PMID: 37748930 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical