Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Feb 22:12:725-734.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S125980. eCollection 2017.

Occupational COPD and job exposure matrices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Steven Sadhra  1 , Om P Kurmi  2 , Sandeep S Sadhra  1 , Kin Bong Hubert Lam  2 , Jon G Ayres  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Occupational COPD and job exposure matrices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Steven Sadhra et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The association between occupational exposure and COPD reported previously has mostly been derived from studies relying on self-reported exposure to vapors, gases, dust, or fumes (VGDF), which could be subjective and prone to biases. The aim of this study was to assess the strength of association between exposure and COPD from studies that derived exposure by job exposure matrices (JEMs).

Methods: A systematic search of JEM-based occupational COPD studies published between 1980 and 2015 was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE, followed by meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, with results presented as a pooled effect estimate with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of study (risk of bias and confounding) was assessed by 13 RTI questionnaires. Heterogeneity between studies and its possible sources were assessed by Egger test and meta-regression, respectively.

Results: In all, 61 studies were identified and 29 were included in the meta-analysis. Based on JEM-based studies, there was 22% (pooled odds ratio =1.22; 95% CI 1.18-1.27) increased risk of COPD among those exposed to airborne pollutants arising from occupation. Comparatively, higher risk estimates were obtained for general populations JEMs (based on expert consensus) than workplace-based JEM were derived using measured exposure data (1.26; 1.20-1.33 vs 1.14; 1.10-1.19). Higher risk estimates were also obtained for self-reported exposure to VGDF than JEMs-based exposure to VGDF (1.91; 1.72-2.13 vs 1.10; 1.06-1.24). Dusts, particularly biological dusts (1.33; 1.17-1.51), had the highest risk estimates for COPD. Although the majority of occupational COPD studies focus on dusty environments, no difference in risk estimates was found for the common forms of occupational airborne pollutants.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need to interpret previous studies with caution as self-reported exposure to VGDF may have overestimated the risk of occupational COPD.

Keywords: COPD; airborne substances; job exposure matrices; occupation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has interest in the subject of this manuscript. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the number of articles in different stages of the selection strategy. Abbreviation: JEMs, job exposure matrices.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Funnel plot of studies reporting COPD (diagnosed by spirometry) associated with exposure to occupational airborne pollutants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot of studies reporting COPD (diagnosed by spirometry or physician) associated with exposure to occupational airborne pollutants.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Becklake MR. Chronic airflow limitation: its relationship to work in dusty occupations. Chest. 1985;88(4):608–617. - PubMed
    1. Balmes J, Becklake M, Blanc P, et al. American Thoracic Society Statement: occupational contribution to the burden of airway disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(5):787–797. - PubMed
    1. Eisner MD, Anthonisen N, Coultas D, et al. An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(5):693–718. - PubMed
    1. Omland O, Wurtz ET, Aasen TB, et al. Occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(1):19–35. - PubMed
    1. Cullinan P. Occupation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Br Med Bull. 2012;104:143–161. - PubMed