Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 17:8:69.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00069. eCollection 2017.

Endocannabinoids: A Promising Impact for Traumatic Brain Injury

Affiliations
Review

Endocannabinoids: A Promising Impact for Traumatic Brain Injury

Lesley D Schurman et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

The endogenous cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) system regulates a diverse array of physiological processes and unsurprisingly possesses considerable potential targets for the potential treatment of numerous disease states, including two receptors (i.e., CB1 and CB2 receptors) and enzymes regulating their endogenous ligands N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG). Increases in brain levels of endocannabinoids to pathogenic events suggest this system plays a role in compensatory repair mechanisms. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathology remains mostly refractory to currently available drugs, perhaps due to its heterogeneous nature in etiology, clinical presentation, and severity. Here, we review pre-clinical studies assessing the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids and manipulations of the endocannabinoid system to ameliorate TBI pathology. Specifically, manipulations of endocannabinoid degradative enzymes (e.g., fatty acid amide hydrolase, monoacylglycerol lipase, and α/β-hydrolase domain-6), CB1 and CB2 receptors, and their endogenous ligands have shown promise in modulating cellular and molecular hallmarks of TBI pathology such as; cell death, excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular breakdown, and cell structure and remodeling. TBI-induced behavioral deficits, such as learning and memory, neurological motor impairments, post-traumatic convulsions or seizures, and anxiety also respond to manipulations of the endocannabinoid system. As such, the endocannabinoid system possesses potential drugable receptor and enzyme targets for the treatment of diverse TBI pathology. Yet, full characterization of TBI-induced changes in endocannabinoid ligands, enzymes, and receptor populations will be important to understand that role this system plays in TBI pathology. Promising classes of compounds, such as the plant-derived phytocannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids, and endocannabinoids, as well as their non-cannabinoid receptor targets, such as TRPV1 receptors, represent important areas of basic research and potential therapeutic interest to treat TBI.

Keywords: cannabinoid; endocannabinoid; neuroprotection; phytocannabinoid; traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Endocannabinoid system cell localization by CNS cell type. Endocannabinoid functional specialization among CNS cell types is determined by the cellular compartmentalization of biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes (biosynthesis by NAPE and DAGL-α, -β, catabolism by FAAH and MAGL). Cellular level changes in eCB biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes as a result of brain injury have yet to be investigated, though morphological and molecular reactivity by cell type is well documented.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Enzymatic regulation of anandamide and 2-AG in normal brain, and following TBI. 2-AG levels are approximately 1,000-fold higher than anandamide levels in brain. MAGL plays a rate-limited role in the production of AA in brain, lung, and liver (Nomura et al., 2008). Arrows represent known TBI-induced changes in eCBs, catabolic and downstream enzymes, and their metabolic products (arrow size has no relation to magnitude of change).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams J. H., Doyle D., Ford I., Gennarelli T. A., Graham D. I., McLellan D. R. (1989). Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology 15 49–59. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb03040.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahn K., Johnson D. S., Mileni M., Beidler D., Long J. Z., McKinney M. K., et al. (2009). Discovery and characterization of a highly selective FAAH inhibitor that reduces inflammatory pain. Chem. Biol. 16 411–420. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.02.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alger B. E., Kim J. (2011). Supply and demand for endocannabinoids. Trends Neurosci. 34 304–315. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.03.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alvarez J., Quevedo O., Furelos L., Gonzalez I., Llapur E., Valeron M., et al. (2015). Pulmonary complications in patients with severe brain injury. Pulm. Res. Respir. Med. 2 69–74. 10.17140/PRRMOJ-2-110 - DOI
    1. Amenta P. S., Jallo J. I., Tuma R. F., Elliott M. B. (2012). A cannabinoid type 2 receptor agonist attenuates blood-brain barrier damage and neurodegeneration in a murine model of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 90 2293–2305. 10.1002/jnr.23114 - DOI - PubMed