Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;9(1):18-32.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00168.1.

Feedback and Assessment Tools for Handoffs: A Systematic Review

Joshua Davis, Catherine Roach, Cater Elliott, Matthew Mardis, Ellen M Justice, Lee Ann Riesenberg

Feedback and Assessment Tools for Handoffs: A Systematic Review

Joshua Davis et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Resident handoff communication skills are essential components of medical education training. There are no previous systematic reviews of feedback and evaluation tools for physician handoffs.

Objective: We performed a systematic review of articles focused on inpatient handoff feedback or assessment tools.

Methods: The authors conducted a systematic review of English-language literature published from January 1, 2008, to May 13, 2015 on handoff feedback or assessment tools used in undergraduate or graduate medical education. All articles were reviewed by 2 independent abstractors. Included articles were assessed using a quality scoring system.

Results: A total of 26 articles with 32 tools met inclusion criteria, including 3 focused on feedback, 8 on assessment, and 15 on both feedback and assessment. All tools were used in an inpatient setting. Feedback and/or assessment improved the content or organization measures of handoff, while process and professionalism measures were less reliably improved. The Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise or a similar tool was used most frequently. Of included studies, 23% (6 of 26) were validity evidence studies, and 31% (8 of 26) of articles included a tool with behavioral anchors. A total of 35% (9 of 26) of studies used simulation or standardized patient encounters.

Conclusions: A number of feedback and assessment tools for physician handoffs in several specialties have been studied. Limited research has been done on the studied tools. These tools may assist medical educators in assessing trainees' handoff skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests. Some preliminary data were presented at the Minority Health Disparities Resource Center Summer Research Display, Birmingham, Alabama, July 2014; the Dale J. Benos Medical Student Research Day, Birmingham, Alabama, October 28, 2014; the American Society of Anesthesiologists Conference, San Diego, California, October 24, 2015; and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Annual Educational Conference, National Harbor, Maryland, February 26, 2016.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Study Selection Process for a Systematic Review of the Literature (2008–2015) on Feedback and Assessment Tools for Shift-to-Shift Handoffs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Patterson ES, Wears RL. . Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010; 36 2: 52– 61. - PubMed
    1. Arora V, Johnson J, Lovinger D, et al. . Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14 6: 401– 407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983; 250 6: 777– 781. - PubMed
    1. Newble DI, Jaeger K. . The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ. 1983; 17 3: 165– 171. - PubMed
    1. Watling C. . Resident teachers and feedback: time to raise the bar. J Grad Med Educ. 2014; 6 4: 781– 782. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources