Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:4703236.
doi: 10.1155/2017/4703236. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

Integrated Approaches for the Management of Staple Line Leaks following Sleeve Gastrectomy

Affiliations

Integrated Approaches for the Management of Staple Line Leaks following Sleeve Gastrectomy

Mauro Montuori et al. J Obes. 2017.

Abstract

Introduction. Aim of the study was trying to draw a final flow chart for the management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, based on the review of our cases over 10 years' experience. Material and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent LSG as a primary operation at the Bariatric Unit of Tor Vergata University Hospital in Rome from 2007 to 2015. Results. Patients included in the study were 418. There were 6 staple line leaks (1.44%). All patients with diagnosis of a leak were initially discharged home in good clinical conditions and then returned to A&E because of the complication. The mean interval between surgery and readmission for leak was 13,4 days (range 6-34 days, SD ± 11.85). We recorded one death (16.67%) due to sepsis. The remaining five cases were successfully treated with a mean healing time of the gastric leak of 55,5 days (range 26-83 days; SD ± 25.44). Conclusion. Choosing the proper treatment depends on clinical stability and on the presence or not of collected abscess. Our treatment protocol showed being associated with low complication rate and minor discomfort to the patients, reducing the need for more invasive procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Male, 48 years, BMI 43 Kg/m2. Evidence of leakage at radiological upper gastrointestinal series.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Male, 34 years, BMI 43 Kg/m2. Evidence of leak in radiological upper gastrointestinal series; confirmation of the leak with fluorescence endoscopy; endoscopic gastrooesophageal stenting.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart for the management of gastric leaks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel on the Identification. The Evidence Report. 98-4083. Bethesda, Md, USA: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
    1. Frezza E. E. Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The future procedure of choice? Surgery Today. 2007;37(4):275–281. doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3407-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perrone F., Bianciardi E., Benavoli D., et al. Gender influence on long-term weight loss and comorbidities after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective study with a 5-year follow-up. Obesity Surgery. 2016;26(2):276–281. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1746-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal R. J. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2012;8(1):8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deitel M., Crosby R. D., Gagner M. The first international consensus summit for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25–27, 2007. Obesity Surgery. 2008;18(5):487–496. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9471-5. - DOI - PubMed