Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;4(1):91-102.
doi: 10.1007/s40487-016-0019-x. Epub 2016 May 3.

The Perspectives of Haematological Cancer Patients on Tissue Banking

Affiliations

The Perspectives of Haematological Cancer Patients on Tissue Banking

Heidi Turon et al. Oncol Ther. 2016.

Abstract

Background: A high level of support for tissue banking has been identified amongst both the general public and patients. However, much debate remains about the regulatory framework of tissue banks.

Objective: This study explored the views of haematological cancer patients regarding tissue banking and how tissue banks should operate.

Methods: Haematological cancer patients from three outpatient clinics in Australia completed a questionnaire examining their preferences for tissue banking as well as items about their sociodemographic characteristics, disease and treatment history.

Results: The majority of participants (95%) reported being willing to allow their leftover tissue to be used for medical research. Three quarters (76%) supported the idea of their medical record being linked to their tissue sample, and 77% preferred a blanket (one-off) consent model for future research use of their tissue sample. Only 57 (27%) participants had been asked to give a tissue sample for research, 98% of whom gave permission.

Conclusion: The majority of haematological cancer patients are willing to donate their leftover tissue to a tissue bank and have their medical records linked to tissue samples and prefer a one-off consent process. These novel data from potential donors inform the debate about how tissue banks might operate.

Funding: Strategic Research Partnership Grant from the Cancer Council NSW to the Newcastle Cancer Control Collaborative (New-3C) and infrastructure funding from the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI). A.W. is supported by an Australian Research Council DECRA fellowship (DE150101262). T.C.M. was supported by a Leukaemia Foundation of Queensland Post-Doctoral Fellowship. A.B. is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1073317) and Cancer Institute NSW (13/ECF/1-37) Early Career Fellowships.

Keywords: Biobanking; Consent; Hematology; Oncology; Tissue banking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Oosterhuis JW, Coebergh JW, van Veen EB. Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(1):73–77. doi: 10.1038/nrc973. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lipworth W, Ankeny R, Kerridge I. Consent in crisis: the need to reconceptualize consent to tissue banking research. Intern Med J. 2006;36(2):124–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01020.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahm A, Wrenn M, Carroll N, Feigelson H. Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding. J Community Genet. 2013;4(4):445–450. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0146-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaufman D, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, Scott J. Preferences for opt-in and opt-out enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of Veterans Administration patients. Genet Med. 2012;14(9):787–794. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.45. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Publ Health. 2006;16(4):433–440. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki198. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources