Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6
- PMID: 28261677
- PMCID: PMC5330379
- DOI: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.90
Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify the predictors of upgrading and degree of upgrading among patients who have initial Gleason score (GS) 6 treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Materials and methods: A retrospective review of the data of 359 men with an initial biopsy GS 6, localized prostate cancer who underwent RARP between July 2005 to June 2010 was performed. They were grouped into group 1 (nonupgrade) and group 2 (upgraded) based on their prostatectomy specimen GS. Logistic regression analysis of studied cases identified significant predictors of upgrading and the degree of upgrading after RARP.
Results: The mean age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 63±7.5 years, 8.9±8.77 ng/mL, respectively. Median follow-up was 59 months (interquartile range, 47-70 months). On multivariable analysis, age, PSA, PSA density and ≥2 cores positive were predictors of upgrading with (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.06; p=0.003; OR, 1.006; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; p=0.018; OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.98, p=0.04), respectively. On subanalysis, only PSA level of 10-20 ng/mL is associated with upgrading into GS ≥8. They also had lower biochemical recurrence free survival, cancer specific survival, and overall survival (p≤0.001, p=0.003, and p=0.01, respectively).
Conclusions: Gleason score 6 patients with PSA (10-20 ng/mL) have an increased risk of upgrading to pathologic GS (≥8), subsequently poorer oncological outcome thus require a stricter follow-up. These patients should be carefully counseled in making an optimal treatment decision.
Keywords: Prognosis; Prostate-specific antigen; Prostatic neoplasms; Radical prostatectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.Urol Oncol. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Oct 17. Urol Oncol. 2011. PMID: 19837614 Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 27245233
-
Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22540236
-
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22085203
-
Risk factors for Gleason Score upgrading following radical prostatectomy.Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Oct;69(5):459-465. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02684-9. Epub 2016 Dec 22. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017. PMID: 28008754 Review.
Cited by
-
Prostate cancer in PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 version 2.1: a comparison to previous PI-RADS versions.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jun;47(6):2187-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03444-1. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022. PMID: 35312821
-
Cancer Associated Macrophage-like Cells Are Prognostic for Highly Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Both the Non-Metastatic and Metastatic Settings.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;15(14):3725. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143725. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37509385 Free PMC article.
-
The factors predicting upgrading of prostate cancer by using International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system.Turk J Urol. 2019 Dec;45(Supp. 1):S36-S41. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.57946. Epub 2018 Sep 4. Turk J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30485787 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):18029-18037. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05506-3. Epub 2023 Nov 18. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37979056 Free PMC article.
-
Are 10-, 10-12-, or > 12-mm prostate biopsy core quality control cutoffs reasonable?World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1055-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2242-6. Epub 2018 Mar 1. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29497860
References
-
- Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, Busby JE, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:162–200. - PubMed
-
- Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Gleason DF, Barry MJ. Competing risk analysis of men aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis managed conservatively for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:975–980. - PubMed
-
- Cohen MS, Hanley RS, Kurteva T, Ruthazer R, Silverman ML, Sorcini A, et al. Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2008;54:371–381. - PubMed
-
- Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Choi YD, et al. Yonsei criteria: a new protocol for active surveillance in the era of robotic and local ablative surgeries. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2013;11:501–507. - PubMed
-
- Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Sebo TJ, et al. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009;181:95–104. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous