Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 6:7:43907.
doi: 10.1038/srep43907.

Prognostic factors of palatal mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis based on a double-center study

Affiliations

Prognostic factors of palatal mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis based on a double-center study

Wenguang Xu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the palate is a common malignancy of minor salivary glands. This study was designed to identify the prognostic factors for MEC of the palate. The medical records of patients diagnosed with MEC of the palate who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Nanjing Stomatological Hospital and the Department of Stomatology at Central Hospital of Xuzhou were retrospectively studied. The prognostic factors were determined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Furthermore, the expression of cancer stem cell (CSC) markers CD44, CD133, Nanog and Sox2 were detected in neoplastic samples of these patients by immunohistochemistry. As a result, both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis proved a high histological grade and an advanced tumor stage as negative prognostic factors for overall survival. By immunohistochemistry staining and survival analysis, a combination of CD44/CD133/SOX2 was found to have the strongest prognostic value for palatal MEC patients. In conclusion, the proposed nomogram which include histological grade and tumor stage along with cancer stem cell markers provides a more accurate long-term prediction for palatal MEC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival estimated by histological grade (A) and tumor stage (B) for the 75 patients with MEC of the palate.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nomogram including histological grade and tumor stage for predicting 3-year, 5-year and 10-year OS for palatal MEC patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Immunohistochemical staining for CD44 (A), CD133 (B), SOX2 (C) and Nanog (D) in palatal MEC tissues.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves estimated by the expression of CD44 (A), CD133 (B), SOX2 (C) and Nanog (D).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier curves estimated by various combination of markers, CD44/CD133 (A), CD44/SOX2 (B), CD44/Nanog (C), CD133/SOX2 (D), CD133/Nanog (E), SOX2/Nanog (F), CD44/CD133/Nanog (G).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Nomogram including histological grade and tumor stage along with CD44/CD133/Nanog expression for predicting 3-year, 5-year and 10-year OS for palatal MEC patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brandwein M. S. et al.. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 80 patients with special reference to histological grading. The American journal of surgical pathology 25, 835–845 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Goode R. K., Auclair P. L. & Ellis G. L. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands: clinical and histopathologic analysis of 234 cases with evaluation of grading criteria. Cancer 82, 1217–1224 (1998). - PubMed
    1. McHugh J. B., Visscher D. W. & Barnes E. L. Update on selected salivary gland neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133, 1763–1774, doi: 10.1043/1543-2165-133.11.1763 (2009). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Speight P. M. & Barrett A. W. Salivary gland tumours. Oral diseases 8, 229–240 (2002). - PubMed
    1. Ali S. et al.. Cause-specific mortality in patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 2396–2404, doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2872-2 (2013). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types