Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;36(12):e328-e333.
doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001576.

The Treatment of Possible Severe Infection in Infants: An Open Randomized Safety Trial of Parenteral Benzylpenicillin and Gentamicin Versus Ceftriaxone in Infants <60 days of Age in Malawi

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Treatment of Possible Severe Infection in Infants: An Open Randomized Safety Trial of Parenteral Benzylpenicillin and Gentamicin Versus Ceftriaxone in Infants <60 days of Age in Malawi

Elizabeth M Molyneux et al. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization recommends benzylpenicillin and gentamicin as antimicrobial treatment for infants with sepsis in low-income settings, and ceftriaxone or cefotaxime as an alternative. In a meta-analysis from 13 low-income settings, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli accounted for 55% of infants with sepsis. In a review of bacterial meningitis, resistance to third generation cephalosporins was >50% of all isolates, and 44% of Gram-negative isolates were gentamicin resistant. However, ceftriaxone may cause neonatal jaundice, and gentamicin may cause deafness. Therefore, we compared parenteral benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin with ceftriaxone as first-line treatment, assessing outcome and adverse events.

Methods: This was an open randomized trial carried out in the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi, from 2010 to 2013. Infants <60 days of age with possible severe sepsis received either benzylpenicillin and gentamicin or ceftriaxone. Adverse events and outcomes were recorded until 6 months post discharge.

Results: Three-hundred forty-eight infants were included in analyses. Outcome in the benzylpenicillin and gentamicin and ceftriaxone groups was similar; deaths were 13.7% and 16.5% and sequelae were 14.5% and 11.2%, respectively. More infants in the penicillin/gentamicin group required phototherapy: 15% versus 5%, P = 0.03. Thirteen (6%) survivors had bilateral hearing loss. There was no difference between the treatment groups. By 6 months post discharge, 11 more infants had died, and 17 more children were found to have sequelae.

Conclusions: Ceftriaxone and gentamicin are safe for infants in our setting. Infants should receive long-term follow-up as many poor outcomes occurred after hospital discharge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study enrollment and outcome

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edmond K, Zaidi A. New Approaches to Preventing, Diagnosing, and Treating Neonatal Sepsis. PLoS Med. 2010 Mar;7(3):e1000213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000213. Published online 2010 Mar 9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Pocket Book of hospital care for children Guidelines for the management of common illnesses with limited resources. 2nd edition. World Health Organisation Geneva: 2013.
    1. The WHO young infants study group. Bacterial etiology of serious infections in young infants in developing countries: results of a multicenter study. PIDJ. 1999;18(supplement):S17–S22. - PubMed
    1. Downie L, Armiento R, Subhi R, et al. Community- acquired neonatal and infant sepsis in developing countries: efficacy of WHO's currently recommended antibiotics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(2):146–54. - PubMed
    1. Huynh B-T, Padget M, Garin B, Herindrainy P, Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Watier L, Guillemot D, Delarocque-Astagneau E. Burden of bacterial resistance among neonatal infections in low income countries: how convincing is the epidemiological evidence? BMC Inf Dis. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0843-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms