Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;29(12):1550-1555.
doi: 10.1037/pas0000465. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Observer, youth, and therapist perspectives on the alliance in cognitive behavioral treatment for youth anxiety

Bryce D McLeod  1 , Michael A Southam-Gerow  1 , Philip C Kendall  2
Affiliations

Observer, youth, and therapist perspectives on the alliance in cognitive behavioral treatment for youth anxiety

Bryce D McLeod et al. Psychol Assess. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

This study examined the score reliability and validity of observer- (Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy-Alliance scale [TPOCS-A]; Vanderbilt Therapeutic Alliance Scale Revised, Short Form [VTAS-R-SF]), therapist- (Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children Therapist Version [TASC-T]), and youth-rated (Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children Child Version [TASC-C]) alliance instruments. Youths (N = 50) aged 7-15 (Mage = 10.28 years, SD = 1.84; 88.0% Caucasian; 60.0% male) diagnosed with a principal anxiety disorder received manual-based cognitive-behavioral treatment. Four independent coders, 2 using the TPOCS-A and 2 using the VTAS-R-SF, rated 2 sessions per case from early (Session 3) and late (Sessions 12) treatment. Youth and therapists completed the TASC-C and TASC-T at the end Session 3 and 12. Internal consistency of the alliance instruments was α > .80 and interrater reliability of the observer-rated instruments was ICC(2,2) > .75. The TPOCS-A, VTAS-R-SF, and TASC-T scores showed evidence of convergent validity. Conversely, the TASC-C scores failed to converge with the other instruments in a sample of children (age <11), but did converge in a sample of adolescents (age ≥11). Findings supported the predictive validity of the TASC-T and TASC-C scores. However, whereas the direction of the alliance-outcome association for both observer-rated instruments was in the expected direction for children (negative), the correlations were in the opposite direction for adolescents (positive). Overall, findings support the score reliability of observer- and therapist-report alliance instruments, but questions are raised about the score validity for the observer- and youth-report alliance instruments. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Accurso E, Garland A. Child, caregiver, and therapist perspectives on therapeutic alliance in usual care child psychotherapy. Psychological Assessment. 2015;27:347–352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Accurso E, Hawley K, Garland A. Psychometric properties of the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for caregivers and parents. Psychological Assessment. 2013;25:244–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Achenbach T. Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR, and TRF. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont; 1991.
    1. Arnett JJ. Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach. Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001.
    1. Brown RC, Parker KM, McLeod BD, Southam-Gerow MA. Building a positive therapeutic relationship with the child or adolescent and parent. In: Sburlati E, Lyneham H, Schniering C, Rapee R, editors. Evidence-based CBT for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: A competencies based approach. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. pp. 63–78.

MeSH terms