Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Feb 27;9(3):202.
doi: 10.3390/nu9030202.

Metabolic Effects of Replacing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages with Artificially-Sweetened Beverages in Overweight Subjects with or without Hepatic Steatosis: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Metabolic Effects of Replacing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages with Artificially-Sweetened Beverages in Overweight Subjects with or without Hepatic Steatosis: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

Vanessa Campos et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Objective: Addition of fructose to the diet of normal weight and overweight subjects can increase postprandial plasma triglyceride and uric acid concentration. We, therefore, assessed whether replacing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) with artificially-sweetened beverages (ASB) in the diet of overweight and obese subjects would decrease these parameters.

Methods: Twenty-six participants of the REDUCS study, which assessed the effects of replacing SSB by ASB over 12 weeks on intra-hepatocellular lipid concentration, were included in this sub-analysis. All were studied after a four-week run-in period during which they consumed their usual diet and SSBs, and after a 12-week intervention in which they were randomly assigned to replace their SSBs with ASBs (ASB arm) or to continue their usual diet and SSBs (control arm, CTRL). At the end of run-in (week 4) and again at the end of intervention (week 16), they took part in an 8.5 h metabolic investigation during which their plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, lactate, triglyceride (TG), non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), and uric acid concentrations were measured over a 30 min fasting period (-30-0 min), then every 2 h over 480 min. with ingestion of standard breakfast at time 0 min and a standard lunch at time 240 min. Breakfast and lunch were consumed together with a 3.3 dL SSB at week 4 and with either an ASB (ASB arm) or a SSB (CTRL arm) at week 16. After analyzing the whole group, a secondary analysis was performed on 14 subjects with hepatic steatosis (seven randomized to ASB, seven to CTRL) and 12 subjects without hepatic steatosis (six randomized to ASB and six to CTRL).

Results: Ingestion of meals increased plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, lactate, and TG concentrations and decreased NEFA concentrations, but with no significant difference of integrated postprandial responses between week 4 and week 16 in both ASB and CTRL, except for a slightly decreased glucagon response in ASB. There was, however, no significant postprandial increase in uric acid concentration in both arms. In the secondary analysis, replacing SSBs with ASBs did not significantly change postprandial TG and uric acid concentrations irrespective of the presence or not of hepatic steatosis, Conclusions: In overweight, high SSB consumers, replacing SSBs with ASBs during 12 weeks did not significantly alter post-prandial TG and uric acid concentration, in spite of the lower energy and fructose content of the meals. These effects were globally the same in subjects without and with hepatic steatosis.

Keywords: cardiovascular risk factors; fructose; hypertriglyceridemia; intrahepatocellular lipid concentration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.T. received speaker’s honoraria from Ferrero, Italy, the Gatorade Sport Science Institute, USA, and C3 collaborating for health, UK. The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Eligibility, enrollment, randomization, and follow-up of study participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental protocol. Every subject was asked to continue her/his usual diet and physical activity throughout the study; during the initial study, all subjects received SSBs according to their usual consumption (run-in). Thereafter, subjects were randomized to receive either ASB (ASB group) or SSBs (CTRL group) for the next 12 weeks (intervention). Throughout the study, subjects visited the clinical research center every two weeks to collect beverages, return empty cans consumed at home, and for anthropometric measurements and clinical chemistry laboratory (basic clinical assessment). Metabolic investigations were done at week 4 and 16. They also had food their food intake monitored every six weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, lactate and glucagon in participants without hepatic steatosis. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.; solid lines correspond to week 4, dotted lines to week 16. Results for ASB arm are shown on the left part, and for CTRL arm on the right part of the graph. Statistics (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with interaction) are reported at the bottom of each graph.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plasma concentrations of TG, NEFA, uric acid, and fructose in participants without hepatic steatosis. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.; solid lines correspond to week 4, dotted lines to week 16. Results for ASB arm are shown on the left part, and for CTRL arm on the right part of the graph. Statistics (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with interaction) are reported at the bottom of each graph.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, lactate and glucagon in participants with hepatic steatosis. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.; solid lines correspond to week 4, dotted lines to week 16. Results for ASB arm are shown on the left part, and for CTRL arm on the right part of the graph. Statistics (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with interaction) are reported at the bottom of each graph.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Plasma concentrations of TG, NEFA, uric acid, and fructose in participants with hepatic steatosis. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.; solid lines correspond to week 4, dotted lines to week 16. Results for ASB arm are shown on the left part, and for CTRL arm on the right part of the graph. Statistics (two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with interaction) are reported at the bottom of each graph.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray G., Nielsen S., Popkin B. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;79:737–743. - PubMed
    1. Bray G.A. Soft drink consumption and obesity: It is all about fructose. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2010;21:51–57. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283346ca2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malik V.S., Popkin B.M., Bray G.A., Despres J.P., Hu F.B. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121:1356–1364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tappy L., Le K.A. Metabolic effects of fructose and the worldwide increase in obesity. Physiol. Rev. 2010;90:23–46. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00019.2009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiu S., Sievenpiper J.L., de Souza R.J., Cozma A.I., Mirrahimi A., Carleton A.J., Ha V., Di Buono M., Jenkins A.L., Leiter L.A., et al. Effect of fructose on markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;68:416–423. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms