Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar 6;14(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0483-1.

Intervening to reduce workplace sitting: mediating role of social-cognitive constructs during a cluster randomised controlled trial

Nyssa T Hadgraft  1   2 , Elisabeth A H Winkler  3 , Genevieve N Healy  4   3   5 , Brigid M Lynch  4   6   7 , Maike Neuhaus  3   8 , Elizabeth G Eakin  3 , David W Dunstan  4   9   10   11   12   13 , Neville Owen  4   3   7   13   14 , Brianna S Fjeldsoe  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intervening to reduce workplace sitting: mediating role of social-cognitive constructs during a cluster randomised controlled trial

Nyssa T Hadgraft et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: The Stand Up Victoria multi-component intervention successfully reduced workplace sitting time in both the short (three months) and long (12 months) term. To further understand how this intervention worked, we aimed to assess the impact of the intervention on four social-cognitive constructs, and examined whether these constructs mediated intervention effects on workplace sitting time at 3 and 12 months post-baseline.

Methods: Two hundred and thirty one office-based workers (14 worksites, single government employer) were randomised to intervention or control conditions by worksite. The intervention comprised organisational, environmental, and individual level elements. Participant characteristics and social-cognitive constructs (perceived behavioural control, barrier self-efficacy, perceived organisational norms and knowledge) were measured through a self-administered online survey at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. Workplace sitting time (min/8 h day) was measured with the activPAL3 device. Single multi-level mediation models were performed for each construct at both time points.

Results: There were significant intervention effects at 3 months on perceived behavioural control, barrier self-efficacy and perceived organisational norms. Effects on perceived organisational norms were not significant at 12 months. Perceived behavioural control significantly mediated intervention effects at 3 months, accounting for a small portion of the total effect (indirect effect: -8.6 min/8 h day, 95% CI: -18.5, -3.6 min; 7.5% of total effect). At 12 months, barrier self-efficacy significantly mediated the intervention effects on workplace sitting time (indirect effect: -10.3 min/8 h day, 95% CI: -27.3, -2.2; 13.9% of total effect). No significant effects were observed for knowledge at either time point.

Conclusions: Strategies that aim to increase workers' perceived control and self-efficacy over their sitting time may be helpful components of sedentary behaviour interventions in the workplace. However, social-cognitive factors only partially explain variation in workplace sitting reduction. Understanding the importance of other levels of influence (particularly interpersonal and environmental) for initiating and maintaining workplace sedentary behaviour change will be informative for intervention development and refinement.

Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials register ( ACTRN12611000742976 ) on 15 July 2011.

Keywords: Intervention; Mediation; Sedentary; Workplace.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mediation analysis overview. Path a effect of the intervention on the social-cognitive constructs; Path b effect of changes in the social-cognitive constructs on workplace sitting time at 3 and 12-months; and Path c' direct effects of the intervention on workplace sitting time
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. La Montagne AD. Integrating health promotion and health protection in the workplace. In: Moodie R, Hulme A, editors. Hands-on health promotion. Melbourne: IP Communications; 2004. pp. 285–298.
    1. Owen N, Sparling PB, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Matthews CE. Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:1138–1141. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0444. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, Bauman A, Lee IM. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388:1302–1310. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Healy GN, Eakin EG, Lamontagne AD, Owen N, Winkler EA, Wiesner G, Gunning L, Neuhaus M, Lawler S, Fjeldsoe BS, Dunstan DW. Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med. 2013;57:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, Clark BK, Gardiner PA, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:128. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-128. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types