Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 6;25(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0370-4.

The haemodynamic dilemma in emergency care: Is fluid responsiveness the answer? A systematic review

Mohammed H Elwan  1   2 , Ashraf Roshdy  3   4 , Eman M Elsharkawy  5 , Salah M Eltahan  5 , Timothy J Coats  6
Affiliations

The haemodynamic dilemma in emergency care: Is fluid responsiveness the answer? A systematic review

Mohammed H Elwan et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Fluid therapy is a common and crucial treatment in the emergency department (ED). While fluid responsiveness seems to be a promising method to titrate fluid therapy, the evidence for its value in ED is unclear. We aim to synthesise the existing literature investigating fluid responsiveness in ED.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched for relevant peer-reviewed studies published from 1946 to present.

Results: A total of 249 publications were retrieved of which 22 studies underwent full-text review and eight relevant studies were identified. Only 3 studies addressed clinical outcomes - including 2 randomised controlled trials and one feasibility study. Five articles evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of fluid responsiveness techniques in ED. Due to marked heterogeneity, it was not possible to combine results in a meta-analysis.

Conclusion: High quality, adequately powered outcome studies are still lacking, so the place of fluid responsiveness in ED remains undefined. Future studies should have standardisation of patient groups, the target response and the underpinning theoretic concept of fluid responsiveness. The value of a fluid responsiveness based fluid resuscitation protocol needs to be established in a clinical trial.

Keywords: Cardiac output; Emergency; Fluid responsiveness; Fluid therapy; Haemodynamics; Resuscitation; Shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Angus DC, Van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:840–851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leisman D, Wie B, Doerfler M, Bianculli A, Ward MF, Akerman M, et al. Association of fluid resuscitation initiation within 30 minutes of severe sepsis and septic shock recognition with reduced mortality and length of stay. Annals of emergency medicine. 2016;68(3):298–311. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, Lahey D, Ngo L, Buras J, Wolfe RE, Weiss JW, Lisbon A. Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol*. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1025–1032. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206104.18647.A8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones AE, Brown MD, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Garrett JS, Heffner AC, Kline JA. The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2734. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186f839. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA. Investigators EMSRN: Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2010;303:739–746. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.158. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources