Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Mar 6:356:j895.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j895.

Risk of serious infections associated with use of immunosuppressive agents in pregnant women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions: cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Risk of serious infections associated with use of immunosuppressive agents in pregnant women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions: cohort study

Rishi J Desai et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective To compare the risk of serious infections associated with use of systemic steroids, non-biologic agents, or tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors in pregnancy.Design Observational cohort study.Setting Public (Medicaid, 2001-10) or private (Optum Clinformatics, 2004-15) health insurance programs in the US.Participants 4961 pregnant women treated with immunosuppressive drugs for rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, or inflammatory bowel disease.Exposure for observational studies Exposure was classified into steroid, non-biologic, or TNF inhibitors on first filled prescription during pregnancy. Because TNF inhibitors are not used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus, patients with this condition were excluded from comparisons involving TNF inhibitors.Main outcome measure The main outcome was occurrence of serious infections during pregnancy, defined by hospital admission for bacterial or opportunistic infections. Hazard ratios were derived using Cox proportional hazard regression models after adjustment for confounding with propensity score fine stratification. A logistic regression model was used to conduct a dose-response analysis among women filling at least one steroid prescription.Results 71 out of 4961 pregnant women (0.2%) treated with immunosuppressive agents experienced serious infections. The crude incidence rates of serious infections per 100 person years among 2598 steroid users, 1587 non-biologic users, and 776 TNF inhibitors users included in this study were 3.4 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 4.7), 2.3 (1.5 to 3.5), and 1.5 (0.7 to 3.0), respectively. No statistically significant differences in the risk of serious infections during pregnancy were observed among users of the three immunosuppressive drug classes: non-biologics v steroids, hazard ratio 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.48 to 1.37), TNF inhibitors v steroids 0.91 (0.36 to 2.26), and TNF inhibitors v non-biologics 1.36 (0.47 to 3.93). In the dose-response analysis, higher steroid dose was associated with an increased risk of serious infections during pregnancy (coefficient for each unit increase in average prednisone equivalent mg daily dose=0.019, P=0.02).Conclusions Risk of serious infections is similar among pregnant women with systemic inflammatory conditions using steroids, non-biologics, and TNF inhibitors. However, high dose steroid use is an independent risk factor of serious infections in pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare the following interests: KFH is supported by a career development award from the National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH099141). BTB is supported by a career development award from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the NIH (K08HD075831). SH-D is supported by the NIH grant R01 MH100216 and has consulted for AstraZeneca (London, UK) for unrelated projects. YP was supported by a training grant from PhRMA. SCK has received research support from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Lilly on unrelated projects. RJD has received research support from Merck on unrelated projects. BTB, KFH, SH-D report receiving research funding from Pfizer, Lilly, and GSK and BTB form Baxalta for unrelated projects. EP has received research funding from GSK and Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Adjusted cumulative incidence plots for serious infections after exposure to immunosuppressive treatments during pregnancy in women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions, Medicaid data 2000-10 and Optum Clinformatics data 2004-15. Comparison of non-biologics versus steroids done in patients with autoimmune inflammatory conditions, including ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors are not indicated for the treatment of SLE and therefore patients with only SLE were excluded from comparisons concerning TNF inhibitors
Fig 2
Fig 2
Adjusted comparative risk estimates for serious infections after exposure to immunosuppressive treatments in pregnancy stratified by disease types, and pooled using inverse variance meta-analysis, Medicaid data 2000-10 and Optum Clinformatics data 2004-15. TNF=tumor necrosis factor α
Fig 3
Fig 3
Dose-response analysis for average daily dose of steroids (in prednisone milligram equivalents) during pregnancy in women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions and serious infection risk, Medicaid data 2000-10 and OptumClinformatics data 2004-15. Plotted lines derived from a model that adjusted for indications (ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), additional immunosuppressive drugs used in pregnancy (non-biologics or tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors), and the insurance program. The average daily dose variable was statistically significant (coefficient=0.019 per 1 mg, P=0.02), indicating increasing risk of serious infections with increasing steroid doses

References

    1. Helmick CG, Felson DT, Lawrence RC, et al. National Arthritis Data Workgroup Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:15-25. 10.1002/art.23177 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kappelman MD, Rifas-Shiman SL, Kleinman K, et al. The prevalence and geographic distribution of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:1424-9. 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.07.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Man YA, Hazes JM, van der Heide H, et al. Association of higher rheumatoid arthritis disease activity during pregnancy with lower birth weight: results of a national prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:3196-206. 10.1002/art.24914 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Østensen M, Fuhrer L, Mathieu R, Seitz M, Villiger PM. A prospective study of pregnant patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis using validated clinical instruments. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:1212-7. 10.1136/ard.2003.016881 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clowse ME. Lupus activity in pregnancy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007;33:237-52, v. 10.1016/j.rdc.2007.01.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances