Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:1507914.
doi: 10.1155/2017/1507914. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Polyps in Individuals with Familial Colorectal Cancer: Could We Avoid Colonoscopies?

Affiliations

Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Polyps in Individuals with Familial Colorectal Cancer: Could We Avoid Colonoscopies?

Cristina Alvarez-Urturi et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017.

Abstract

Background. Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) have an increased risk of CRC. We evaluated the diagnostic yield of CCE in the detection of lesions and also two different colon preparations. Methods. A prospective multicenter study was designed to assess CCE diagnostic yield in a cohort of asymptomatic individuals with a family history of CRC. CCE and colonoscopy were performed on the same day by 2 endoscopists who were blinded to the results of the other procedure. Results. Fifty-three participants were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of CCE for detecting advanced adenomas were 100%, 98%, 67%, and 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of CCE for the diagnosis of individuals with polyps were 87%, 97%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. CCE identify 100% of individuals with significant or advanced lesions. Overall cleanliness was adequate by 60.7% of them. The PEG-ascorbic boost seems to improve colon cleanliness, with similar colonic transit time. Conclusion. CCE is a promising tool, but it has to be considered as an alternative technique in this population in order to reduce the number of colonoscopies performed. More studies are needed to understand appropriate screening follow-up intervals and optimize the bowel preparation regimen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of patients with acceptable preparation in capsule endoscopy with different boosters (p = 0.1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patients satisfaction level (%) with colon capsule and colonoscopy.

References

    1. Butterworth A. S., Higgins J. P. T., Pharoah P. Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Cancer. 2006;42(2):216–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng S. C., Lau J. Y. W., Chan F. K. L., et al. Increased risk of advanced neoplasms among asymptomatic siblings of patients with colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(3):544–550. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castells A., Marzo M., Bellas B., et al. Clinical guidelines for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterologia y Hepatologia. 2004;27(10):573–634. doi: 10.1157/13069131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piñol V., Andreu M., Castells A., Payá A., Bessa X., Jover R. Frequency of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and other colorectal cancer familial forms in Spain: A Multicentre, Prospective, Nationwide Study. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2004;16(1):39–45. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200401000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dove-Edwin I., Sasieni P., Adams J., Thomas H. J. W. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year, prospective, follow-up study. British Medical Journal. 2005;331(7524):1047–1049. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38606.794560.eb. - DOI - PMC - PubMed