Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:6956941.
doi: 10.1155/2017/6956941. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Longitudinal Impact of the Smoking Ban Legislation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Admissions

Affiliations

Longitudinal Impact of the Smoking Ban Legislation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Admissions

D Abreu et al. Biomed Res Int. 2017.

Abstract

Background and Purpose. The association between smoking and CV has been proved; however smoking is still the first preventable cause of death in the EU. We aim to evaluate the potential impact of the smoke ban on the number of ACS events in the Portuguese population. In addition, we evaluate the longitudinal effects of the smoking ban several years after its implementation. Methods. We analyzed the admission rate for ACS before and after the ban using data from hospital admission. Monthly crude rate was computed, using the Portuguese population as the denominator. Data concerning the proportion of smokers among ACS patients were obtained from the NRACS. Interrupted time series were used to assess changes over time. Results. A decline of -5.8% was found for ACS crude rate after the smoking ban. The decreasing trend was observed even after years since the law. The effect of the ban was higher in men and for people over 65 years. The most significant reduction of ACS rate was found in Lisbon. Conclusions. Our results suggest that smoking ban is related to a decline in ACS admissions, supporting the importance of smoke legislation as a public health measure, contributing to the reduction of ACS rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Longitudinal trends for overall monthly crude rates (per 100000 adult population) of ACS admissions from January 2002 to December 2014. Prelegislation and postlegislation periods.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of ACS patients that are current smokers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teo K. K., Ounpuu S., Hawken S., et al. Tobacco use and risk of myocardial infarction in 52 countries in the INTERHEART study: A Case-Control Study. Lancet. 2006;368(9536):647–658. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69249-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopez A. D., Mathers C. D., Ezzati M., Jamison D. T., Murray C. J. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scoggins A., de Vries H., Conklin A., Hatziandreu E. Analysis to Support the Impact Assessment of the Commission's Smoke-Free Initiatives. Santa Monica, Calif, USA: RAND; 2009.
    1. He J., Vupputuri S., Allen K., Prerost M. R., Hughes J., Whelton P. K. Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340(12):920–926. doi: 10.1056/nejm199903253401204. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glantz S. A., Parmley W. W. Even a little secondhand smoke is dangerous. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286(4):462–463. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.4.462. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources