Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;14(2):241-250.
doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9773-1. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients

Affiliations

The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients

Andrew M Courtwright et al. J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Despite increased calls for hospital ethics committees to serve as default decision-makers about life-sustaining treatment (LST) for unrepresented patients who lack decision-making capacity or a surrogate decision-maker and whose wishes regarding medical care are not known, little is known about how committees currently function in these cases. This was a retrospective cohort study of all ethics committee consultations involving decision-making about LST for unrepresented patients at a large academic hospital from 2007 to 2013. There were 310 ethics committee consultations, twenty-five (8.1 per cent) of which involved unrepresented patients. In thirteen (52.0 per cent) cases, the ethics consultants evaluated a possible substitute decision-maker identified by social workers and/or case managers. In the remaining cases, the ethics consultants worked with the medical team to contact previous healthcare professionals to provide substituted judgement, found prior advance care planning documents, or identified the patient's best interest as the decision-making standard. In the majority of cases, the final decision was to limit or withdraw LST (72 per cent) or to change code status to Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate (12 per cent). Substitute decision-makers who had been evaluated through the ethics consultation process and who made the final decision alone were more likely to continue LST than cases in which physicians made the final decision (50 per cent vs 6.3 per cent, p = 0.04). In our centre, the primary role of ethics consultants in decision-making for unrepresented patients is to identify appropriate decision-making standards. In the absence of other data suggesting that ethics committees, as currently constituted, are ready to serve as substitute decision-makers for unrepresented patients, caution is necessary before designating these committees as default decision-makers.

Keywords: Best interests; Decision-making; Ethics committees; Ethics consultation; Surrogates; Unrepresented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Massachusetts General Hospital Life Sustaining Treatment Policy: Patients lacking decision-making capacity and a surrogate decision-maker

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahluwalia SC, Levin JR, Lorenz KA, Gordon HS. Missed opportunities for advance care planning communication during outpatient clinic visits. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012;227(4):445–451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Bar Association. Default surrogate consents statutes as of June 2014. 2014 Available at: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/2014.... Accessed November 17, 2015.
    1. Brock D. Death and dying: Euthanasia and sustaining life: Ethical issues. In: Reich E, editor. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1995. pp. 563–572.
    1. Cox CE, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, et al. Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Critical Care Medicine. 2009;37(11):2888–2894. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Courtwright AM, Brackett S, Cadge W, Krakauer EK, Robinson EM. Experience with a hospital policy on not offering cardiopulmonary resuscitation when believed more harmful than beneficial. Journal of Critical Care. 2015;30(1):173–177. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources