Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients
- PMID: 28267947
- DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1704500215
Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients
Abstract
Newer second generation supraglottic airway devices may perform differently in vivo due to material and design modifications. We compared performance characteristics of the Ambu® AuraGain™ and LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™ in 100 spontaneously breathing anaesthetised patients in this randomised controlled study. We studied oropharyngeal leak pressures (OLP) (primary outcome) and secondarily, ease of insertion, success rates, haemodynamic response, time to insertion, and complications of usage. We found no significant difference in OLP between the AuraGain versus the LMA Supreme, mean (standard deviation, SD) 24.1 (7.4) versus 23.6 (6.2) cmH2O, P=0.720. First-attempt placement rates of the AuraGain were comparable to the LMA Supreme, 43/50 (86%) versus 39/50 (78%), P=0.906, with an overall 98% insertion success rate for the AuraGain and 88% for the LMA Supreme after three attempts, P=0.112. However, the AuraGain was deemed subjectively harder to insert, with only 24/50 (48%) versus 37/50 (74%) of AuraGain insertions being scored 1 = easy (on a 5 point scale), P=0.013, and also took longer to insert, 33.4 (SD 10.9) versus 27.3 (SD 11.4) seconds, P=0.010. The AuraGain needed a smaller volume of air (16.4 [SD 6.8] versus 23.0 [SD 7.4] ml, P <0.001) to attain intracuff pressures of 60 cmH2O, facilitated more successful gastric tube insertion (100% versus 90.9%, P=0.046), and had significantly decreased sore throat incidence (10% versus 38%, P=0.020). One AuraGain and six LMA Supremes failed to be placed within the stipulated 120 seconds trial definition of 'success'; these patients had risk factors for failed supraglottic insertion. In conclusion, both devices had similar OLPs and performed satisfactorily. However, the AuraGain resulted in less postoperative sore throat despite being harder to and taking longer to, insert.
Keywords: Ambu AuraGain, LMA supreme, spontaneous breathing, oropharyngeal leak pressures, sore throat.
Similar articles
-
Ventilatory performance of AMBU® AuraGain™ and LMA® Supreme™ in laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2021 Sep;49(5):395-403. doi: 10.1177/0310057X211030521. Epub 2021 Sep 22. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2021. PMID: 34550812 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial.Can J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;65(7):797-805. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1120-4. Epub 2018 Mar 26. Can J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 29582360 Clinical Trial. English.
-
A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1255-1262. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9963-0. Epub 2016 Nov 26. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017. PMID: 27889843 Clinical Trial.
-
Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway.Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):483-93. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9673-0. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Can J Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 22318376 Review.
-
Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 18. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27555181 Review.
Cited by
-
Comprehensive evaluation of manikin-based airway training with second generation supraglottic airway devices.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Mar 1;15:367-376. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S194728. eCollection 2019. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019. PMID: 30881002 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.Indian J Anaesth. 2023 May;67(5):426-431. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_203_22. Epub 2023 May 11. Indian J Anaesth. 2023. PMID: 37333703 Free PMC article.
-
A Literature Review of Factors Related to Postoperative Sore Throat.J Clin Med Res. 2022 Feb;14(2):88-94. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4665. Epub 2022 Feb 24. J Clin Med Res. 2022. PMID: 35317364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gastric Tube Insertion Performance of Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway Devices: A Prospective Manikin Study With Literature Review.Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67863. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67863. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39328652 Free PMC article.
-
AuraGain and i-Gel laryngeal masks in general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Performance characteristics and effects on hemodynamics.Saudi Med J. 2018 Nov;39(11):1082-1089. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.11.22346. Saudi Med J. 2018. PMID: 30397706 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical