Nepafenac 0.3% after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy: Results of 2 Randomized Phase 3 Studies
- PMID: 28268098
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.036
Nepafenac 0.3% after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy: Results of 2 Randomized Phase 3 Studies
Abstract
Purpose: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of once-daily nepafenac 0.3% ophthalmic suspension versus vehicle, based on clinical outcomes, after cataract surgery in patients with diabetes.
Design: Two prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies.
Participants: Total, 615 patients in study 1 and 605 patients in study 2.
Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1) to topical nepafenac 0.3% or vehicle once-daily starting the day before surgery and continuing for 90 days thereafter.
Main outcome measures: Key efficacy variables were: patients (%) in whom macular edema (ME) developed (≥30% increase from preoperative baseline central subfield macular thickness) within 90 days after cataract surgery and the patients (%) with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline through day 14 maintained through day 90. Secondary end points included: patients (%) with a BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline through days 90 and 60 and safety over 3 months.
Results: A significantly lower percentage of patients demonstrated ME within 90 days after surgery with nepafenac 0.3% versus vehicle (study 1: 2.3% vs. 17.3%; P < 0.001; study 2: 5.9% vs. 14.3%; P = 0.001; pooled: 4.1% vs. 15.9%; P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving a ≥15-letter improvement from baseline through day 14 maintained through day 90 with nepafenac 0.3% versus vehicle was 61.7% versus 43.0% (P < 0.001) in study 1, 48.8% versus 50.5% (P = 0.671) in study 2, and 55.4% versus 46.7% (P = 0.003) in the pooled analysis. A greater percentage of patients treated with nepafenac 0.3% versus vehicle in study 1 and similar percentage in study 2 had a BCVA improvement of ≥15 letters from preoperative baseline through day 90 (77.2% vs. 67.7% [P = 0.009] and 65.4% vs. 65.9% [P = 0.888]) and through day 60 (76.2% vs. 64.7% [P = 0.002] and 68.9% vs. 62.1% [P = 0.092]). No unanticipated adverse events were observed.
Conclusions: These studies demonstrated the clinical benefits of nepafenac 0.3% over vehicle in reducing the risk of postoperative ME, with the integrated analysis showing improved BCVA after cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy, with no unanticipated safety events.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Re: Singh et al.: Nepafenac 0.3% after cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy: results of 2 randomized phase 3 studies (Ophthalmology. 2017;124:776-785).Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):e10-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.024. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29268871 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):e11-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.023. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29268872 No abstract available.
-
Re: Singh et al.: Nepafenac 0.3% after cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy: results of 2 randomized phase 3 studies (Ophthalmology. 2017;124:776-785).Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.023. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29268873 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):e4-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.024. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29268874 No abstract available.
-
Re: Singh et al.: Nepafenac 0.3% after cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy: result of 2 randomized phase 3 studies (Ophthalmology. 2017;124:776-785).Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):e8-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.025. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29268877 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):e9-e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.026. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29268878 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
