Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 21:8:233.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233. eCollection 2017.

Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment

Johannes A C Laferton et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Patients' expectations in the context of medical treatment represent a growing area of research, with accumulating evidence suggesting their influence on health outcomes across a variety of medical conditions. However, the aggregation of evidence is complicated due to an inconsistent and disintegrated application of expectation constructs and the heterogeneity of assessment strategies. Therefore, based on current expectation concepts, this critical review provides an integrated model of patients' expectations in medical treatment. Moreover, we review existing assessment tools in the context of the integrative model of expectations and provide recommendations for improving future assessment. The integrative model includes expectations regarding treatment and patients' treatment-related behavior. Treatment and behavior outcome expectations can relate to aspects regarding benefits and side effects and can refer to internal (e.g., symptoms) and external outcomes (e.g., reactions of others). Furthermore, timeline, structural and process expectations are important aspects with respect to medical treatment. Additionally, generalized expectations such as generalized self-efficacy or optimism have to be considered. Several instruments assessing different aspects of expectations in medical treatment can be found in the literature. However, many were developed without conceptual standardization and psychometric evaluation. Moreover, they merely assess single aspects of expectations, thus impeding the integration of evidence regarding the differential aspects of expectations. As many instruments assess treatment-specific expectations, they are not comparable between different conditions. To generate a more comprehensive understanding of expectation effects in medical treatments, we recommend that future research should apply standardized, psychometrically evaluated measures, assessing multidimensional aspects of patients' expectations that are applicable across various medical treatments. In the future, more research is needed on the interrelation of different expectation concepts as well as on factors influencing patients' expectations of illness and treatment. Considering the importance of patients' expectations for health outcomes across many medical conditions, an integrated understanding and assessment of such expectations might facilitate interventions aiming to optimize patients' expectations in order to improve health outcomes.

Keywords: assessment; expectations; operationalization; optimism; outcome expectancy; placebo effect; self-efficacy; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic illustration of the integrative model of expectations in patients undergoing medical treatment. Behavior, treatment and outcome related aspects of expectations refer to the specific treatment context. Generalized expectations are independent of the specific treatment context, but might influence specific expectations and treatment outcome. Timeline expectations refer to temporal aspects of the disease, treatment and health behavior, e.g., the course of disease in the context of the treatment.

References

    1. Armitage C. J., Norman P., Alganem S., Conner M. (2015). Expectations are more predictive of behavior than behavioral intentions: evidence from two prospective studies. Ann. Behav. Med. 49 239–246. 10.1007/s12160-014-9653-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer C. J., Glombiewski J. A., Doering B. K., Winkler A., Laferton J. A. C., Broadbent E., et al. (2016a). Patients’ expectations predict surgery outcomes: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Behav. Med. 23 49–62. 10.1007/s12529-015-9500-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer C. J., Kube T., Laferton J. A. C., Salzmann S., Shedden-Mora M. C., Rief W., et al. (2016b). Welche erwartungen sagen postoperative depressivität und ängstlichkeit bei herzchirurgischen patienten am stärksten vorher? [Which expectations have the strongest predictive value for postsurgical depression and anxiety in patients undergoing CABG surgery]. Z. Klin. Psychol. Psychother. 45 93–108. 10.1026/1616-3443/a000358 - DOI
    1. Axelrad K. J. (1982). Locus of control and causal attributions as they relate to expectations for coping with a heart attack. Diss. Abstr. Int. 42:4924.
    1. Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.