Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)
- PMID: 28271426
 - PMCID: PMC5359153
 - DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3950-5
 
Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)
Abstract
Background: Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another.
Results: Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.
Conclusions: The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.
Keywords: bariatric surgery; super obese; systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
Funders
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), Evidence-Based Synthesis Program (ESP).
Prior Presentations
None.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
- 
    
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Bariatric Surgical Procedures for Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Review of Comparative Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines. CADTH Rapid Response Service. 2014. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Bariatric Surgery for Obese Patients with Co-Morbidities: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidlines. CADTH Rapid Response Service. 2013.
 
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
              
              