Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Apr;32(Suppl 1):48-55.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3963-0.

Improving Weight in People with Serious Mental Illness: The Effectiveness of Computerized Services with Peer Coaches

Alexander S Young  1   2   3 , Amy N Cohen  4   5 , Richard Goldberg  6   7 , Gerhard Hellemann  5 , Julie Kreyenbuhl  6   7 , Noosha Niv  5   8 , Nancy Nowlin-Finch  5   9 , Rebecca Oberman  4 , Fiona Whelan  5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving Weight in People with Serious Mental Illness: The Effectiveness of Computerized Services with Peer Coaches

Alexander S Young et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: People with serious mental illness have high rates of obesity and related medical problems, and die years prematurely, most commonly from cardiovascular disease. Specialized, in-person weight management interventions result in weight loss in efficacy trials with highly motivated patients. In usual care, patient enrollment and retention are low with these interventions, and effectiveness has been inconsistent.

Objective: To determine whether computerized provision of weight management with peer coaching is feasible to deliver, is acceptable to patients, and is more effective than in-person delivery or usual care.

Design: Mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.

Participants: Two hundred seventy-six overweight patients with serious mental illness receiving care at a Veterans Administration medical center.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to 1) computerized weight management with peer coaching (WebMOVE), 2) in-person clinician-led weight services, or 3) usual care. Both active interventions offered the same educational content.

Main measures: Body mass index; and feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.

Key results: At 6 months, in obese patients (n = 200), there was a significant condition by visit effect (F = 4.02, p = 0.02). The WebMOVE group had an average estimated BMI change from baseline to 6 months of 34.9 ± 0.4 to 34.1 ± 0.4. This corresponds to 2.8 kg (6.2 lbs) weight loss (t = 3.2, p = 0.001). No significant change in BMI was seen with either in-person services (t = 0.10, p = 0.92), or usual care (t = -0.25, p = 0.80). The average percentage of modules completed in the WebMOVE group was 49% and in the in-person group was 41% (t = 1.4, p = 0.17). When non-obese patients were included in the analyses, there was a trend towards a condition by visit effect (F = 2.8, p = 0.06). WebMOVE was well received, while the acceptability of in-person services was mixed.

Conclusions: Computerized weight management with peer support results in lower weight, and can have greater effectiveness than clinician-led in-person services. This intervention is well received, and could be feasible to disseminate.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness; counseling; information technology; mental illness; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram for randomized controlled trials depicting the flow of patients through eligibility, assessment, randomization, intervention, and outcome analyses. CONSORT Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in body mass index over 6 months by treatment condition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dickerson FB, Brown CH, Kreyenbuhl JA, Fang L, Goldberg RW, Wohlheiter K, Dixon LB. Obesity among individuals with serious mental illness. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;113(4):306–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00637.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Obesity and Overweight Atlanta, Gerogia: CDC / National Center for Health Statistics; 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html. Accessed May 20, 2016.
    1. Marder SR, Essock SM, Miller AL, Buchanan RW, Casey DE, Davis JM, Kane JM, Lieberman JA, Schooler NR, Covell N, Stroup S, Weissman EM, Wirshing DA, Hall CS, Pogach L, Pi-Sunyer X, Bigger JT, Jr, Friedman A, Kleinberg D, Yevich SJ, Davis B, Shon S. Physical health monitoring of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(8):1334–1349. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1334. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon LB, Dickerson F, Bellack AS, Bennett M, Dickinson D, Goldberg RW, Lehman A, Tenhula WN, Calmes C, Pasillas RM, Peer J, Kreyenbuhl J. The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36(1):48–70. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischhacker WW, Arango C, Arteel P, Barnes TR, Carpenter W, Duckworth K, Galderisi S, Halpern L, Knapp M, Marder SR, Moller M, Sartorius N, Woodruff P. Schizophrenia—time to commit to policy change. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(Suppl 3):S165–S194. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms