Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;21(4):401-418.
doi: 10.1007/s40291-017-0272-1.

The Utility of Biomarkers in Osteoporosis Management

Affiliations
Review

The Utility of Biomarkers in Osteoporosis Management

Patrick Garnero. Mol Diagn Ther. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

The measurement of bone turnover markers is useful for the clinical investigation of patients with osteoporosis. Among the available biochemical markers, the measurements of serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and the crosslinked C-terminal telopeptide (serum CTX) have been recommended as reference markers of bone formation and bone resorption, respectively. The important sources of preanalytical and analytical variability have been identified for both markers, and precise measurement can now be obtained. Reference interval data for PINP and CTX have been generated across different geographical locations, which allows optimum clinical interpretation. However, conventional protein-based markers have some limitations, including a lack of specificity for bone tissue, and their inability to reflect osteocyte activity or periosteal metabolism. Thus, novel markers such as periostin, sclerostin and, sphingosine 1-phosphate have been developed to address some of these shortcomings. Recent studies suggest that the measurements of circulating microRNAs, a new class of marker, may represent early biological markers in osteoporosis. Bone markers have been shown to be a useful adjunct to bone mineral density for identifying postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture. Because levels of bone markers respond rapidly to both anabolic and anticatabolic drugs, they are very useful for investigating the mechanism of action of new therapies and, potentially, for predicting their efficacy to reduce fracture risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):429-35 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Dec;24(12):2971-81 - PubMed
    1. Bone. 2007 May;40(5):1222-30 - PubMed
    1. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Nov;97(5):495-505 - PubMed
    1. RNA Biol. 2012 Sep;9(9):1147-54 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources