iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics
- PMID: 28271869
- PMCID: PMC5648544
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8
iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: e143-52.Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):e242. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30240-2. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31044717 No abstract available.
Abstract
Tumours respond differently to immunotherapies compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, raising questions about the assessment of changes in tumour burden-a mainstay of evaluation of cancer therapeutics that provides key information about objective response and disease progression. A consensus guideline-iRECIST-was developed by the RECIST working group for the use of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) in cancer immunotherapy trials, to ensure consistent design and data collection, facilitate the ongoing collection of trial data, and ultimate validation of the guideline. This guideline describes a standard approach to solid tumour measurements and definitions for objective change in tumour size for use in trials in which an immunotherapy is used. Additionally, it defines the minimum datapoints required from future trials and those currently in development to facilitate the compilation of a data warehouse to use to later validate iRECIST. An unprecedented number of trials have been done, initiated, or are planned to test new immune modulators for cancer therapy using a variety of modified response criteria. This guideline will allow consistent conduct, interpretation, and analysis of trials of immunotherapies.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
LS reports grants from AstraZeneca and Merck, outside the submitted work. AP owns stocks in Merck & Co. RF reports personal fees from Amgen, Abbvie, Aptiv, Aragon, BMS, Bioclinica, Celldex, Celsion, Clovis, Covance, Biomedical systems, ACR Image Metrix, Exelixis, Genentech, Janssen, Kyowa, Loxo, ICON Medical Imaging, Eisai, EMD Serono, Imaging Endpoints, Mlrati, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Novocure, Roche, Pfizer, Quintile, Tokai, ONO, Red Hill, Radiant Sage, Orbimed Advisors, Cinven, Virtualscopics, Sun Advanced Pharma Research Company, Median Therapeutics, Optimer Biotechnology Inc, Vascular Biogenics, Ignyta, Immunocellular CBT Pharmaceuticals, Tracon, DNAtrix, CytRx, Kolltan, and Samsung Bioepsis, outside the submitted work. LHS reports grants and consulting fees from Novartis, grants from Astellas, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, consulting fees from GSK, outside the submitted work. JD reports grants from Merck, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Novartis, outside the submitted work. FSH reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and personal fees from Merck, Novartis, Genentech, and EMD Serono, outside the submitted work. Additionally, FSH has a patent MICA Related Disorders with royalties paid, and a patent Tumor Antigens and Uses Thereof issued. JDW reports grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Genentech during the conduct of the study; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck, and is on the scientific advisory board for Medimmune, outside the submitted work. MB reports personal fees from Genentech outside the submitted work, and owns stocks in Roche. CC reports personal fees from Roche, BMS, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. EGEdV reports consulting fees from Synthon, Medivation, and Merck; and grants from Novartis, Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Servier, Chugai, Synthon, AstraZeneca, and Radius Health, outside the submitted work. JB, SM, NUL, SL, AC, PT, OSH, and LKS declare no competing interests.
Figures


Comment in
-
iRECIST Guideline Unveiled for Immunotherapies.Cancer Discov. 2017 May;7(5):446-447. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2017-037. Epub 2017 Mar 16. Cancer Discov. 2017. PMID: 28302600
-
iRECIST: A clarification of tumour response assessment in the immunotherapy era.Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;77:165-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Apr 4. Eur J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28385325 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kim C, Prasad V. Cancer drugs approved on the basis of a surrogate end point and subsequent overall survival: an analysis of 5 years of US Food and Drug Administration approvals. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1992–94. - PubMed
-
- Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981;47:207–14. - PubMed
-
- Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16. - PubMed
-
- Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1·1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. - PubMed
-
- Liu Y, Litière S, de Vries EG, et al. The role of response evaluation criteria in solid tumor in anticancer treatment evaluation: results of a survey in the oncology community. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:260–66. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical