Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;96(10):e6278.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006278.

Mobile teledermatology for skin cancer screening: A diagnostic accuracy study

Stefan Markun  1 , Nathalie Scherz, Thomas Rosemann, Ryan Tandjung, Ralph P Braun
Affiliations

Mobile teledermatology for skin cancer screening: A diagnostic accuracy study

Stefan Markun et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Skin cancer screening has undoubted potential to reduce cancer-specific morbidity and mortality. Total-body exams remain the prevailing concept of skin cancer screening even if effectiveness and value of this method are controversial. Meanwhile, store and forward teledermatology was shown to be a reliable instrument for several diagnostic purposes mostly in specialized dermatology settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate most convenient mobile teledermatology interventions as instruments for skin cancer screening in a representative population.Prospective diagnostic study with visitors of a skin cancer screening campaign in Switzerland. Histopathology was used as reference standard. Mobile teledermatology with or without dermoscopic images was assessed for performance as a screening test (i.e., rule-in or rule-out the need for further testing). Outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.Seven cases of skin cancer were present among 195 skin lesions. All skin cancers were ruled-in by teledermatology with or without dermoscopic images (sensitivity and negative predictive value 100%). The addition of dermoscopic images to conventional images resulted in higher specificity (85% vs. 77%), allowing reduction of unnecessary further testing in a larger proportion of skin lesions.Store and forward mobile teledermatology could serve as an instrument for population-based skin cancer screening because of favorable test performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow-chart and outcome counts.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lutz JM, Francisci S, Mugno E, et al. Cancer prevalence in Central Europe: the EUROPREVAL Study. Ann Oncol 2003;14:313–22. - PubMed
    1. Heinzerling LM, Dummer R, Panizzon RG, et al. Prevention campaign against skin cancer. Dermatology 2002;205:229–33. - PubMed
    1. van der Leest RJ, de Vries E, Bulliard JL, et al. The Euromelanoma skin cancer prevention campaign in Europe: characteristics and results of 2009 and 2010. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:1455–65. - PubMed
    1. Choudhury K, Volkmer B, Greinert R, et al. Effectiveness of skin cancer screening programmes. Br J Dermatol 2012;167(Suppl):94–8. - PubMed
    1. Gordon LG, Rowell D. Health system costs of skin cancer and cost-effectiveness of skin cancer prevention and screening: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2015;24:141–9. - PubMed