Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 14;3(2):211-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.01.003. eCollection 2017 Mar.

Gastric Cancer Genomics: Advances and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Gastric Cancer Genomics: Advances and Future Directions

Bryson W Katona et al. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

Advancement in the field of cancer genomics is revolutionizing the molecular characterization of a wide variety of different cancers. Recent application of large-scale, next-generation sequencing technology to gastric cancer, which remains a major source of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, has helped better define the complex genomic landscape of this cancer. These studies also have led to the development of novel genomically based molecular classification systems for gastric cancer, reinforced the importance of classic driver mutations in gastric cancer pathogenesis, and led to the discovery of new driver gene mutations that previously were not known to be associated with gastric cancer. This wealth of genomic data has significant potential to impact the future management of this disease, and the challenge remains to effectively translate this genomic data into better treatment paradigms for gastric cancer.

Keywords: ACRG, Asian Cancer Research Group; CIN, chromosomal instability; Driver Gene Mutations; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; GS, genomic stability; Gastric Cancer; Genomics; MSI, microsatellite instability; MSS, microsatellite stable; NGS, next-generation sequencing; Next-Generation Sequencing; PD-L, programmed death-ligand; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Molecular classifications of gastric cancers. TCGA molecular subtypes including EBV positive, MSI, GS, and CIN. ACRG molecular subtypes including MSI and MSS tumors with either MSS/EMT, TP53 activity (MSS/TP53+), or TP53 inactivity (MSS/TP53-). Percentages represent the fraction of molecularly characterized gastric cancer samples belonging to each subtype.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Commonly mutated pathways in gastric cancers. NGS genomic studies have identified multiple pathways that contain genes that are mutated frequently in gastric cancers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Hayakawa Y., Sethi N., Sepulveda A.R. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer: should we mind the gap? Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:305–318. - PubMed
    1. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49. - PubMed
    1. Aaltonen L.A., Hamilton S.R., World Health Organization . IARC Press/Oxford University Press; Lyon: 2000. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system.
    1. Macdonald J.S., Smalley S.R., Benedetti J. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–730. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources