Towards Integrating Primary Care with Cancer Care: A Regional Study of Current Gaps and Opportunities in Canada
- PMID: 28277204
- PMCID: PMC5344363
Towards Integrating Primary Care with Cancer Care: A Regional Study of Current Gaps and Opportunities in Canada
Abstract
Background and objectives: Better integration between cancer care systems and primary care physicians (PCPs) is a goal of most healthcare systems, but little direction exists on how this can be achieved. This study systematically examined the extent of integration between PCPs and a regional cancer program (RCP) to identify opportunities for improvement.
Method: Cross-sectional survey of all practising PCPs in the region of interest using a study-specific instrument based on a three-tier conceptualization of integration.
Results: Among the 473 PCPs who responded (63% response rate), perceived role clarity and the desire for greater involvement in patient care varied across the care trajectory. Specific gaps were identified in PCPs' understanding of the referral process and patient follow-up after treatment.
Conclusion: Our novel survey of PCPs explicated the strategies that could improve their integration in cancer care, including mechanisms to support PCPs in the initial diagnosis of their patients and standardized post-treatment transition plans outlining care roles and responsibilities.
Contexte et objectif:: Une meilleure intégration entre les systèmes de soins contre le cancer et les médecins de première ligne (MPL) est un des objectifs de la plupart des systèmes de santé, mais il existe peu de guides d'orientation pour y arriver. Cette étude examine systématiquement l'étendue de l'intégration des MPL et des programmes régionaux contre le cancer afin de repérer les occasions propices à l'amélioration.
Méthode:: Un sondage transversal, employant un instrument spécifique pour l'étude fondé sur une conceptualisation à trois volets de l'intégration, a été mené auprès de tous les MPL de la région étudiée.
Résultats:: Parmi les 473 MPL qui ont répondu au sondage (taux de réponse de 63 %), la clarté du rôle perçu et le désir d'une meilleure participation dans les soins au patient varient le long de la trajectoire de soins. Des lacunes précises ont été identifiées quant à la compréhension qu'ont les MPL du processus d'aiguillage et du suivi des patients après le traitement.
Conclusion:: Notre nouveau sondage auprès des MPL éclaire les stratégies qui pourraient permettre d'améliorer l'intégration entre les MPL et les soins contre le cancer, notamment des mécanismes de soutien pour les MPL dans le diagnostic initial ainsi que des plans standardisés de transition post-traitement qui définissent les rôles et responsabilités pour les soins.
Copyright © 2017 Longwoods Publishing.
Similar articles
-
Job satisfaction of the primary healthcare providers with expanded roles in the context of health service integration in rural China: a cross-sectional mixed methods study.Hum Resour Health. 2019 Sep 2;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0403-3. Hum Resour Health. 2019. PMID: 31477136 Free PMC article.
-
Who is Responsible for What Happens Before, During, and After Colonoscopy? Results of a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;52(6):e44-e47. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000881. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 28737648
-
Team dynamics, clinical work satisfaction, and patient care coordination between primary care providers: A mixed methods study.Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Jan/Mar;42(1):28-41. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000091. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017. PMID: 26545206
-
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study.Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):259-65. Am J Manag Care. 2011. PMID: 21615196 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care providers' experience and satisfaction with personalised breast cancer screening risk communication: a descriptive cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e093936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093936. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40316347 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Implementing palliative care education into primary care practice: a qualitative case study of the CAPACITI pilot program.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Sep 28;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01265-7. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37759200 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal cancer screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors.J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):541-552. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01258-0. Epub 2022 Oct 10. J Cancer Surviv. 2024. PMID: 36217067 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care: a scoping review.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jan 22;32(2):120. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08278-1. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38252169 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the Attitudes and Beliefs of Oncologists Regarding the Transitioning and Sharing of Survivorship Care.Curr Oncol. 2021 Dec 19;28(6):5452-5465. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060454. Curr Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34940093 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and Provider Attitudes and Preferences Regarding Early Palliative Care Delivery for Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Prospective Survey.Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 13;31(6):3329-3341. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31060253. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38920736 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bainbridge D., Brazil K., Krueger P., Ploeg J., Taniguchi A., Darney J. 2011. “Evaluating Program Integration and the Rise in Collaboration: A Case Study of A Palliative Care Network.” Journal of Palliative Care 27(4): 270–78. - PubMed
-
- Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). 2015. “Regional Cancer Programs.” Retrieved September 23, 2016. <www.cancercare.on.ca/ocs/rcp/>.
-
- Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). 2016. “Incidence & Mortality by Local Health Integration Network (LHIN).” Retrieved September 23, 2016. <www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/One.aspx?portalId=1377&pageId=121943#two-tab>.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources