Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;129(4):629-637.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001927.

Predictors of Low Uptake of Prenatal Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Immunization in Privately Insured Women in the United States

Affiliations

Predictors of Low Uptake of Prenatal Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Immunization in Privately Insured Women in the United States

Anne M Butler et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the uptake of prenatal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization among pregnant women in the United States.

Methods: Using MarketScan data, we conducted a historical cohort study among pregnant women with employer-based commercial insurance in the United States who delivered between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. We examined temporal trends of uptake, predictors of uptake, and timing of Tdap immunization.

Results: Among 1,222,384 eligible pregnancies in 1,147,711 women, receipt of prenatal Tdap immunization increased from 0.0% of women who delivered in January 2010 to 9.8% who delivered in October 2012 (the date of the recommendation by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Tdap during every pregnancy) to 44.4% who delivered in December 2014. Among women who received Tdap during pregnancy, the majority were immunized between 27 weeks and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation per the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendation. In multivariable analyses among women who delivered between November 2012 and December 2014, rates of prenatal Tdap immunization were lower for women younger than 25 years of age (eg, 20-24 compared with 30-34 years rate ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.88), with other children (eg, three compared with zero children: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.88), residing in the South compared with the Midwest (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.80-0.82), or with emergency department visits in early pregnancy (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92-0.95). The proportion of pregnant women who received prenatal Tdap increased with increasing gestational age at birth.

Conclusion: By the end of 2014, fewer than half of pregnant women in the United States were receiving prenatal Tdap immunization. Implementation and dissemination strategies are needed to increase Tdap coverage among pregnant women, especially those who are young, have other children, or reside in the South.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of pregnancies with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization, by delivery month and timing of vaccine administration, 2010–2014. Grey dotted lines denote the June 2011 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations for Tdap for unvaccinated pregnant women and October 2012 ACIP recommendations for Tdap immunization with each pregnancy. Results did not change appreciably in the sensitivity analyses that excluded 1,695 (0.1%) women who delivered before 27 weeks of gestation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of pregnancies with prenatal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization receipt by delivery month, 2010–2014, by maternal age (A), number of other dependent children (B), geographic region of residence (C). Grey dotted lines denote the June 2011 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations for Tdap for unvaccinated pregnant women and October 2012 ACIP recommendations for Tdap immunization with each pregnancy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Geographic distribution of prenatal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization (%) by state, November 2012–December 2014. Analysis was restricted to the time period following the October 2012 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted rate ratio estimates for the associations between prenatal tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine receipt and patient characteristics among pregnant women, November 2012–December 2014. A total of 14,829 (6.4%) of mothers were excluded from these analyses due to missing data on at least one potential predictor (ie, health insurance type, residence within a metropolitan statistical area, and/or region of residence). aRR, adjusted rate ratio; CI, confidence interval; HMO, Health Maintenance Organization; PPO, Preferred Provider Organization; EPO, Exclusive Provider Organization; POS, Point of Service; CDHP, Consumer Directed Health Plan.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014 Provisional Pertussis Surveillance Report. 2015
    1. Cortese MM, Baughman AL, Zhang R, Srivastava PU, Wallace GS. Pertussis hospitalizations among infants in the United States, 1993 to 2004. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):484–492. - PubMed
    1. Kline JM, Lewis WD, Smith EA, Tracy LR, Moerschel SK. Pertussis: a reemerging infection. American family physician. 2013;88(8):507–514. - PubMed
    1. Pertussis vaccination: use of acellular pertussis vaccines among infants and young children. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control. 1997;46(Rr-7):1–25. - PubMed
    1. Auerbach BS, Lake AM, Wilson ME, et al. Dose-response to a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine in infants and comparison with whole-cell vaccine. Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization. 1998;26(2):145–153. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances