Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system
- PMID: 28278514
- PMCID: PMC5396110
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.52
Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of molecular carcinogenic pathways. Based on recent findings regarding the multiple serrated neoplasia pathway, we revised an eight-marker panel for a new CIMP classification system.
Methods: 1370 patients who received surgical resection for CRCs were classified into three CIMP subtypes (CIMP-N: 0-4 methylated markers, CIMP-P1: 5-6 methylated markers and CIMP-P2: 7-8 methylated markers). Our findings were validated in a separate set of high-risk stage II or stage III CRCs receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (n=950).
Results: A total of 1287/62/21 CRCs cases were classified as CIMP-N/CIMP-P1/CIMP-P2, respectively. CIMP-N showed male predominance, distal location, lower T, N category and devoid of BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P1 showed female predominance, proximal location, advanced TNM stage, mild decrease of CK20 and CDX2 expression, mild increase of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P2 showed older age, female predominance, proximal location, advanced T category, markedly reduced CK20 and CDX2 expression, rare KRAS mutation, high frequency of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-N showed better 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.28-0.78) in discovery set and better 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS; HR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.29-0.88) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1. CIMP-P2 showed marginally better 5-year CSS (HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.07-1.22) in discovery set and marginally better 5-year RFS (HR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.92) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1.
Conclusions: CIMP subtypes classified using our revised system showed different clinical outcomes, demonstrating the heterogeneity of multiple serrated precursors of CIMP-positive CRCs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reply to 'Comment on 'Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system".Br J Cancer. 2018 Feb 6;118(3):e4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.426. Epub 2018 Jan 2. Br J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29384526 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comment on 'Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system'.Br J Cancer. 2018 Feb 6;118(3):e3. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.343. Epub 2018 Jan 2. Br J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29384528 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Andre T, de Gramont A, Vernerey D, Chibaudel B, Bonnetain F, Tijeras-Raballand A, Scriva A, Hickish T, Tabernero J, Van Laethem JL, Banzi M, Maartense E, Shmueli E, Carlsson GU, Scheithauer W, Papamichael D, Moehler M, Landolfi S, Demetter P, Colote S, Tournigand C, Louvet C, Duval A, Flejou JF, de Gramont A (2015) Adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in stage II to III colon cancer: updated 10-year survival and outcomes according to BRAF mutation and mismatch repair status of the MOSAIC Study. J Clin Oncol 33(35): 4176–4187. - PubMed
-
- Barault L, Charon-Barra C, Jooste V, de la Vega MF, Martin L, Roignot P, Rat P, Bouvier AM, Laurent-Puig P, Faivre J, Chapusot C, Piard F (2008) Hypermethylator phenotype in sporadic colon cancer: study on a population-based series of 582 cases. Cancer Res 68(20): 8541–8546. - PubMed
-
- Bettington M, Walker N, Rosty C, Brown I, Clouston A, McKeone D, Pearson SA, Klein K, Leggett B, Whitehall V (2016) Serrated tubulovillous adenoma of the large intestine. Histopathology 68(4): 578–587. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
