Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 10:7:44093.
doi: 10.1038/srep44093.

Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health

Affiliations

Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health

Kenichiro Motomura et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Caesarean section (CS) is increasing globally, and women with prior CS are at higher risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. However, little is known about the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of uterine rupture in women with prior CS, especially in developing countries. To investigate this, we conducted a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health, which included data on delivery from 359 facilities in 29 countries. The incidence of uterine rupture among women with at least one prior CS was 0.5% (170/37,366), ranging from 0.2% in high-Human Development Index (HDI) countries to 1.0% in low-HDI countries. Factors significantly associated with uterine rupture included giving birth in medium- or low-HDI countries (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.0 and 3.88, respectively), lower maternal educational level (≤6 years) (AOR 1.71), spontaneous onset of labour (AOR 1.62), and gestational age at birth <37 weeks (AOR 3.52). Women with uterine rupture had significantly higher risk of maternal death (AOR 4.45) and perinatal death (AOR 33.34). Women with prior CS, especially in resource-limited settings, are facing higher risk of uterine rupture and subsequent adverse outcomes. Further studies are needed for prevention/management strategies in these settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study sample selection flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Onset of labour in women with prior caesarean section who had uterine rupture in the current pregnancy by Human Development Index (HDI) group.

References

    1. Vogel J. P. et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 3, e260–270, doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(15)70094-x (2015). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betran A. P. et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 11, e0148343, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 (2016). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennare R., Tucker G., Heard A. & Chan A. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 109, 270–276, doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250469.23047.73 (2007). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V. L., Easterling T. R. & Martin D. P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 3–8, doi: 10.1056/nejm200107053450101 (2001). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spong C. Y. et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 110, 801–807, doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2 (2007). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types